|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 10th, 2005, 04:00 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo/Sydney
Posts: 297
|
lumiere 2.0 with gy-hd100
I was just wondering how lumiere hd actually converts the hd100 signal, does it have its own codec for 720/24p? im talking about the lumiere 2.0hd version and does anybody have this set up? a gy-hd100 and lumiere 2.0 with fcp 4.5 or 5. please get back to me, because i am about invest in both very soon and would like abit of assistance. also with the pulldown? should i have that off?
|
|
|
|
October 10th, 2005, 08:26 AM
|
#2 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
v2.0 hasn't been released yet. Go to www.lumiereHD.com and click on support and then go into forums to keep up on its status.
|
|
|
|
|
October 11th, 2005, 05:55 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo/Sydney
Posts: 297
|
"lumière HD 2.0 is priced at $179.00 and will be available in July 2005, or will be a free upgrade for current owners of Lumière HD."
its been released, isnt there a guy from lumiere that regularly visits this site? any feed back from him? |
|
|
|
|
October 11th, 2005, 07:42 AM
|
#4 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
That press release is old. It hasn't been released. Frederic told me last week that there is no firm ETA on the final release, but they will be releasing a beta soon. I'm not sure if it will be private of public beta. You'll have to keep an eye on the LumiereHD forums on their website.
|
|
|
|
|
October 11th, 2005, 07:46 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 11th, 2005, 10:07 AM
|
#6 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo/Sydney
Posts: 297
|
its good to know that the whole community is on this site, from the developers to the people who give feedback to r&d to the end user.
thanks for the time, i hope frederick can give us some lo down to when the whole beta thing will come in. |
|
|
|
|
October 14th, 2005, 01:59 AM
|
#7 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 437
|
Days away from a beta release
We are days away from a beta release which will support the 24p and the 25p of the HD100.
It's a tricky format but we're getting there. Frederic |
|
|
|
|
October 14th, 2005, 11:24 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 15th, 2005, 01:37 AM
|
#9 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo/Sydney
Posts: 297
|
Frederic would the beta be for only the people that have bought the previous software or is it an open beta?
|
|
|
|
|
October 18th, 2005, 10:59 PM
|
#10 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
The new beta with HD100 support has been released. v1.6b2
It also supports the BR-HD50 deck. http://www.lumierehd.com/ |
|
|
|
|
October 19th, 2005, 02:21 AM
|
#11 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
I don't know how I did it, but I actually captured my 24p footage and began to edit in FCP5....!!!!! Hurrah! Watch out folks... =) Last edited by Brian Duke; October 19th, 2005 at 03:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
October 19th, 2005, 03:49 AM
|
#12 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Tim,
What I don't get is how you transfer ytour final cut to DVD or HDV tape after you finish and keep the quality HDV. It seems like the footage is being transferred compressed, thus losing the high end quality. Duke |
|
|
|
|
October 19th, 2005, 09:37 AM
|
#13 | |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
As for output back to HDV tape, if you didn't do any "processing" to the image (colour correction, effects, etc.,) then in theory you should be able to output back to tape without recompression artifacts. However, that seems impractical and improbable, so there isn't really any good way around it, except to work in a lossless codec, and then downconvert back to HDV. Personally, I would consider HDV and aquisition format only... immediately convert it to an intermediate codec to work with, and then never go back. For archiving, just use DVD-ROM and export a "Quicktime Movie," using current settings, and make it self-contained. DO NOT recompress frames. |
|
|
|
|
|
October 19th, 2005, 10:09 AM
|
#14 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Francisco CA
Posts: 386
|
Any idea when support for re-compression and going back to the camera or HDV deck with the 24p HDV will be supported?
Also, I understand from JVC that 24p is not supported natively by DVHS devices, only 30p, so will we have to convert 24p to 30p to make it possible to back it up, or play it on DVHS machines? It seems weird that JVC would make an HDV camera that is incompatible with it's own devices, after all, wasn't the original idea that HDV is a consumer HD video format that would be used to play your home videos on consumer playback devices? Thanks, Paul
__________________
Paul |
|
|
|
|
October 20th, 2005, 12:36 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 437
|
Quote:
We should be able to offer 'back to HDV' in native 24p in no time. Frederic |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
