|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 19th, 2005, 10:59 PM | #46 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 68
|
Lens Pics
Hi Micheal,
I posted these three/four days back, I think you have seen them, below nis the link http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=52880 |
October 20th, 2005, 07:22 AM | #47 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 873
|
Quote:
|
|
October 20th, 2005, 08:41 AM | #48 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 68
|
Pics
I have already done that, with links pls check this in the forum
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=52880 |
October 20th, 2005, 08:42 AM | #49 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 68
|
Sorry Guys
These are not the frame grabs but the setup, will post these on Saturday.
|
January 3rd, 2006, 10:09 PM | #50 | ||
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Quote:
I know this is an old thread, but I got to it while researching about the HD100 lens and saw this comment. I find it hard to believe normal 2/3" lenses resolve 80-100 lp/mm when Zeiss Digiprimes resolve only 56 lp/mm. I’m sure the Digiprimes will be sharper and better than any 2/3” lenses out there. Based on this fact, I also find the found 133 lp/mm for the HD100 a weird number. If the 2/3” 1920x1080 Cinealta get the best results with a 56 lp/mm lens, I don’t think the 1280x720 HD100, even if 1/3”, needs almost 3 times more resolution at 133 lp/mm. Just speculating, but something tells me the numbers in this thread are somewhat off. |
||
February 17th, 2006, 07:07 PM | #51 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Burnaby & Maple Ridge BC
Posts: 289
|
BUMP. Just figured I'd revive this. Does anyone have any new reports on using alternate lenses on the HD100? (Not so much the 13x option, but 1/2" lenses or others?)
I've been trying to dig up info on other options myself. There is one I was wondering about, a lens for the GY-X3 and Panasonic AJ-D215 cameras: T14X5.5BRM. It's one of the few native 1/3" lenses I could find. Certainly an older model, but someone out there might have one they could try. The big questions are: does the quality hold up for HD, and is the 1/3" mount the same as the HD100? |
March 30th, 2006, 04:40 AM | #52 | |
Sponsor: MTF Services
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 80
|
MTF (modulation transfer function)
Quote:
Testing a lens for MTF performance usually involves projecting an image through the lens from a graticle, onto a screen and the MTF is then measured by a sensor. A figure of 80%-99% (the measured difference between the black and white portion of a line pair) would be thought of as reasonable measured at the centre. When people say that the Zeiss resolves only 56 lp/mm this is not strictly true. In actual fact the Zeiss can probably resolve around 200 lp/mm. The figure of 56 lp/mm only refers to the standard by which HD lenses are measured and , hence the graticle that is used during MTF testing. Incidentally, the standard for 35mm motion picture lens testing is only 20 lp/mm, However when I was at Optex we used a 40 lp/mm standard. I hope this makes things a bit clearer. |
|
| ||||||
|
|