|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 8th, 2009, 10:27 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warren Vermont
Posts: 73
|
MR HD100 vs DR HD100
Ready to buy one of these, but still haven't heard if the audio buzz has been fixed in the DR HD100, any word, anyone?
Secondly, it looks like the extra $500 for the MR HD100 is for the meta data part, is that all? TIA, Ed |
July 8th, 2009, 02:31 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 65
|
It is also much smaller, lighter, quieter, and better on batteries.
|
July 10th, 2009, 07:17 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 695
|
Basically it does the same.
The startup time is longer with the MR-HD100. Advantages over the DR-HD100 are: - possibility to add meta-data through iPhone while recording. Makes it a breeze while editing to find a shot. - More flexible to create your own directories and to select them from the unit to record into that map. - NTFS system which doesn't cut long recordings into 2Gb files. - New upcoming firmware will have on screen thumbnail browser and playback.
__________________
Marc Colemont - Belgium - http://www.mc-productions.be JVC GY-HM850's, HM890, HM600 |
July 13th, 2009, 12:52 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warren Vermont
Posts: 73
|
Thanks guys,
Yeah, I knew about the specs. I'm really trying to get at the reliability. Meta data is cool, but I don't know I'd use it. The 2gig Fat32 limit makes the MR100 more attractive. I still haven't heard anything recently about the audio buzz problem with the DR100. If it's gone I'd probably go with the DR to save $. Ed |
| ||||||
|
|