|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 5th, 2009, 12:35 PM | #31 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
But, if the product you deliver for your clients is only considered "fairly decent" then the Cavision filters should be just fine. I am not affiliated with Schneider Optics, but their Multi-Coated Filters are a cut above the Tiffen filters you judge by. |
|
January 5th, 2009, 02:48 PM | #32 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
And if anyone asks me about filters I'm going to refer them to DVInfo and a search on Ryan Avery as there's a whole tutorial contained within these pages!
Steve |
January 15th, 2009, 10:26 AM | #33 | |
Sponsor: Schneider Optics
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
Good point except you are missing where the problem really lies. The IR contamination problems experienced by Sony EX and RED camera users are a result of an inefficient IR filter at the sensor. ND filters that are off in their color mix by just a few tenths of a percent can lead to worse IR control on a small level when stacked. A good extremely dense ND (1.5 or 1.8) can control some of the IR light contamination but not all. Using an IR/ND combo filter can negate this effect but only if you have a camera with this problem. I would love to sell everybody the much more expensive IR/ND filters but if you don't have a camera that has the IR problem, you don't need it and it will just cost you more. Also IR/ND filters reflect IR light so if you put them in the wrong place in the matte box (behind any other filter) then you might suffer from internal lens reflections and other imaging problems. IR/ND's work great if you use them properly for the right purpose with little negative effect. I highly doubt that everybody will need one of these in the future unless camera manufacturers continue to produce cameras with this issue. Ryan Avery Schneider Optics |
|
| ||||||
|
|