Jvc Hd10 at DVinfo.net

Darrin McMillan · January 28th, 2006, 11:56 AM

Well guy's I just have to share this experience. I will try to post some video in the future. I did a shoot the other night, kinda hacking around but it was a fairly good setup with controlled lighting and sound. I used my XL2 and my HD10, the results are really incredible. The video from the JVC in my opinion smokes the XL2. This isn't the first time I've seen this. I will try to post the video or pics to just to let you guy's see the difference. It really is unbelievable

Tom Roper · January 28th, 2006, 12:32 PM

Look forward to that.

Zack Birlew · January 31st, 2006, 02:14 PM

It is at 30P 720p though, I take it?

Darrin McMillan · January 31st, 2006, 05:15 PM

Yep both cameras were shot using 30p. MInd you the resolution on the JVC is higher I believe. Then It was put together using Vegas and rendered at 1280 720. But even when I downrezed, the JVC still looked better.

Alex Ced · January 31st, 2006, 05:51 PM

Then, why everybody says that this jvc camera "sucks"?
Just a question, not a war...

Darrin McMillan · January 31st, 2006, 07:36 PM

If you're not really careful it can really suck. However under the right controlled conditions it's magic...Well maybe not magic but pretty good. At that prosumer price range you certainly can't find any complete solution, every unit has there thing, and I guess everybody loves to bash JVC.

January 28th, 2006, 11:56 AM	#1
Darrin McMillan Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Kingston, Ontario Posts: 96	Jvc Hd10 Well guy's I just have to share this experience. I will try to post some video in the future. I did a shoot the other night, kinda hacking around but it was a fairly good setup with controlled lighting and sound. I used my XL2 and my HD10, the results are really incredible. The video from the JVC in my opinion smokes the XL2. This isn't the first time I've seen this. I will try to post the video or pics to just to let you guy's see the difference. It really is unbelievable

January 31st, 2006, 02:14 PM	#3
Zack Birlew Major Player Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 613	It is at 30P 720p though, I take it? __________________ "Babs Do or Babs Do not, there is no try." - Zack Birlew www.BabsDoProductions.com

January 31st, 2006, 05:15 PM	#4
Darrin McMillan Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Kingston, Ontario Posts: 96	720 30p Yep both cameras were shot using 30p. MInd you the resolution on the JVC is higher I believe. Then It was put together using Vegas and rendered at 1280 720. But even when I downrezed, the JVC still looked better.

January 31st, 2006, 05:51 PM	#5
Alex Ced New Boot Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: PANAMA Posts: 11	all my respects Then, why everybody says that this jvc camera "sucks"? Just a question, not a war... __________________ Nothing will stop me to reach my goal

January 31st, 2006, 07:36 PM	#6
Darrin McMillan Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Kingston, Ontario Posts: 96	It can If you're not really careful it can really suck. However under the right controlled conditions it's magic...Well maybe not magic but pretty good. At that prosumer price range you certainly can't find any complete solution, every unit has there thing, and I guess everybody loves to bash JVC.

January 28th, 2006, 12:32 PM	#2
Tom Roper Trustee Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Denver, Colorado Posts: 1,891	Look forward to that.