|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 2nd, 2004, 03:33 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 489
|
inaccurate 16:9 frame on HD1 LCD Screen?
Hi everybody,
I have a JVC GR-PD1 which is similar to the HD1 except that it's not HD. After completing a shoot in Tokyo last week, watching footage in the KDDI editing software... I have learnt that the 16:9 image on the LCD screen is inaccurate, in terms of framing. The actual frame is larger than that represented on the LCD screen when shooting. When I look at my shots, there's an extra bit on the left and right! I don't know if the image in the viewfinder lied in this way, as I rarely looked through it. Has anybody else experienced this problem? Is there a simple way to fix it? Is it possible that at anothe juncture in the editing process the image will 'jump back' to that ratio portrayed whilst shooting? I imagine I will simply have to mask when doing my final cut - but would appreciate hearing other opinions. Thanks very much.
__________________
www.irishfilmmaker.com |
November 4th, 2004, 05:32 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 489
|
guess it's just the PD1
__________________
www.irishfilmmaker.com |
November 4th, 2004, 05:59 PM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,800
|
All of the prosumer cameras have LCD's and viewfinders that overscan. This goes for the VX-2100, PD-170, PDX-10, XL-1, GL-2, XL-2, etc.
Unfortunately it's just something you have to be aware of and allow some breathing room such that unwanted objects don't appear in the final frame. If viewing on a regular TV this shouldn't be a problem because they also overscan. The only way around this is to use a pro monitor or a laptop that shows the full frame when you shoot. At one time or another I'll bet that we've all been "bitten" by this. I know I have... |
November 5th, 2004, 01:27 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Katoomba NSW Australia
Posts: 635
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Graham Jones Senior : guess it's just the PD1 -->>>
I left replying to this one alone.....initially. I don't have a JVC PD1 PAL 'Extended' definition camcorder, and as the HD10u I do own doesn't exhibit this particular behaviour I couldn't really comment. The HD10 is pretty much WYSIWYG on the LCD....so perhaps it is just a case of the same pixel count LCD not being 'set' to fully resample the lower resolution PAL signal. But that's just a guess.......... |
November 5th, 2004, 02:34 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 489
|
Thanks Boyd and Steve.
To be honest, I'd wager the HD1 and HD10 overscan to the same extent. I wouldn't have even noticed it on 95% of the shots. Just the 5% with very tight framing. It's an overscan of about 2 - 3%. Oh well. Now I know..
__________________
www.irishfilmmaker.com |
| ||||||
|
|