|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 30th, 2004, 03:53 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 393
|
Which is better century's DS-65CV-58 or raynox's HD7000Pro for wide angle lens
Hey, does anyone know if Raynox makes an completely zoomable anamorphic lens, especially for the HD product line (I checked and can't find any info that they do, but I have to at least ask). Also, both century and raynox makes a wide angle completely zoomable lens, does anyone know which is better (i.e. century's DS-65CV-58 versus raynox's HD7000Pro).
Thanks |
June 30th, 2004, 11:21 PM | #2 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Is this in regards to the JVC HD10 or HD1?
Thanks, heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
July 1st, 2004, 02:24 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 393
|
Heath, it is in regards to the HD10U
Thanks |
July 1st, 2004, 04:14 PM | #4 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Thanks, Dwight, just making sure, so that way you're in the right place. Sometimes, a surfer will post in here for something regarding a different camera.
Thanks, heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
July 1st, 2004, 04:29 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 393
|
Nope, if I am here, you can assume it has something to do with my HD10U (it may, as a secondary matter, have similar applications for other cams).
Thanks |
July 2nd, 2004, 06:41 AM | #6 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
No sweat!
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
July 2nd, 2004, 09:01 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 1,315
|
And back to the topic :)
We had decided not to pick-up the Cavison wide angle we we got the gear last week. They seemed a little flakey if they should be selling it as a HD10 lens. So we are in the same boat. What is the best for the least? Ken
__________________
Damnit Jim, I'm a film maker not a sysytems tech. |
July 2nd, 2004, 02:01 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 393
|
I have bought the hd-7000pro from raynox, which is designed for HD, and is less than half of the price of the century. I am testing it this weekend. To improve the quality a bit I also bought a cavision lens hood ($70) which fits on the 82mm thread of the raynox wide angle lens (and a french flag for an extra $30 which brought the total to a little over $100). Both the raynox and the century are 58mm and are fully zoomable, so the question remains which is better. Is the century better at all, especially at more than twice the price.
Thanks |
July 2nd, 2004, 09:15 PM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 1,315
|
I wonder if our Cavision 3x3 matte box will work with the hd-7000pro from raynox?
__________________
Damnit Jim, I'm a film maker not a sysytems tech. |
| ||||||
|
|