|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 17th, 2003, 11:49 PM | #31 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
"Although the PAL-system XL1S / GL2 are not "true" progressive scan camcorders, they do have a 25p mode (Frame Movie mode). For all intents and purposes, it is 25p."
Well, yes and no. It acts like 25p, but the result is a significant loss of resolution, whereas true progressive results in a significant gain in resolution. Referring back to Steve Mullen's "Progressive - What You Need To Know" article: Interlaced NTSC = max 360 lines Frame Mode = max of about 320 lines Progressive/Thin Line detail: max of 480 lines. So, you could say Frame Mode = progressive scan - 33% of its potential resolution. |
November 18th, 2003, 12:04 AM | #32 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 33
|
So is the PAL XL1 Frame Mode (25p) 650 lines?
|
November 18th, 2003, 12:33 AM | #33 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
November 18th, 2003, 01:09 AM | #34 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Apologies to all for the off-topic posts in this thread; of which I took a part -- we'll now steer this back to HD10E discussion *only* please -- thanks!
|
November 19th, 2003, 09:49 AM | #35 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Plainfield, New Jersey
Posts: 927
|
>>The camcorder also incorporates a standard mode with 4:3 DV compression of MPEG-2 at 480/60p or 480/60i.<<
The thing that I don't get is that if this camera is for Europe, why does it record and play at 480/60i? Shouldn't it be 480/50i? Or even 625/50i, like the GR-PD1? There is something fishy about this press release. |
November 19th, 2003, 01:33 PM | #36 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 216
|
Regarding this press release, I also noted that another similar document from an Australian site, at
http://www.provis.com.au/products/video/jy_hd10e.htm purports to address the HD10e for Australia, but in the content, the reference inexplicably defaults to HD10"U" and describes the "U" version. It looks like there are a number of fishy press releases about. Brian |
November 20th, 2003, 05:49 PM | #37 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 267
|
Hmm i'm about to grab a MVX3i - if this thing comes out i may get it instead (would rather spend that bit more and get HD even if its first gen). plz any solid info would be great :)
__________________
Welcome... to the real world! |
| ||||||
|
|