|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 2nd, 2006, 11:31 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Innsbruck,Austria
Posts: 45
|
Mac Laptop for HDV
Coming from the pc world, please forgive my ignorance...but want to start a smooth apple integration...
what I want to do: Capturing HDV via firewire, a rough cut, some titels and effects with aftereffects, adding music and finally playing out the timeline via FCP to a projector...this should happen during an afternoon...a few days later I would bring the Laptop in the studio and load the rawfootage to my HP9300 quad and finalize the project.... Would this work, any experiences? Can anyone recommend a laptop which fits the needs? Type, RAM, Prozessor and whatever... Has anyone experience with the new Dual Intel MacBookPro? Any advice would be much appreciated alex |
February 3rd, 2006, 04:05 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 139
|
Be advised that you won't get anything remotely resembling a smooth workflow if you want to go from Mac to PC (or vice versa).
That said, it doesn't make any sense to buy an Apple laptop other than the MacBook Pro. The G4's are way behind in performance. Final Cut Pro does not run on the MacBook Pro at the moment, but it will soon.
__________________
Please keep in mind that English is not my native language. |
February 3rd, 2006, 05:48 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo/Sydney
Posts: 297
|
I run the G4 1.67 and it works fine, I even use after effects and motion on it, I added another gig of ram so it takes me to 1.5gig. Ram helps it but if you want pure render speed then go macbook pro but I would wonder how it would go in universal code.
__________________
"eyes through a digital world" |
February 3rd, 2006, 05:48 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo/Sydney
Posts: 297
|
I run the G4 1.67 and it works fine, I even use after effects and motion on it, I added another gig of ram so it takes me to 1.5gig. Ram helps it but if you want pure render speed then go macbook pro but I would wonder how it would go in universal code.
__________________
"eyes through a digital world" |
February 18th, 2006, 06:32 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Torres Strait - Australia
Posts: 76
|
hdv notebooks
I don't believe it's possible to be more ignorant about hdv editing than I am but could someone please enlighten me on this. when I recently found out about the new applemac pro I though that finally there is a portable editing facility. then, my knowledgeable computer friend says that it was still not sufficient enough a computer for hdv.
I want to buy an hdv capable laptop/notebook for use on my boat. if this new applemac pro can't do it then what can ??????? |
February 18th, 2006, 06:50 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 475
|
If Apple's Final Cut Pro is fully compatible with the new Intel processor (which is not at this moment, think NAB) then yes, you've got a powerful tool and definitely good enough for HDV. On the other hand, and that's maybe what your friend is meaning, you can not hook up a HD in-out card like a Kona or blackmagic one to this machine, so previewing on a external monitor is not an option. If you want this you need a desktop at the moment.
|
February 18th, 2006, 08:05 PM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
Quote:
One benefit of HDV (and a drawback) is that the bandwidth is equal or less than regular standard def DV. This means that a laptop, the MacBook or the G4 laptops, can ingest and work with HD video without a problem. There are two drawbacks to this method. Due to the nature of HDV, it can't be played as you edit on an external monitor like DV can. You can only use the laptop's screen to play and edit the footage. The second drawback is that any effect or filter you apply will take a long time to render. How long depends on the computer but there are no real-time effects like you can get with DV footage. Here a MacBook would have an advantage as it would render everthing faster. The finished project would also have to be prepared by the program before you record it back to HDV tape. One way to watch the edit is to export a DV version and play that back on an external monitor. How fast the file takes to render depends on the computer.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
|
February 19th, 2006, 09:42 AM | #8 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
As far as effects or filters are concerned, I'm doing real-time HDV color correction and two-layer PIP effects in Edius Pro 3 on a dual-core computer with processing power similar to what you can now get in a laptop. Edius on a dual-core laptop should be a good HDV editing solution, and Canopus allows you to install on two computers for transfer back and forth to a desktop editing system. |
|
February 19th, 2006, 10:20 AM | #9 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
|
|
February 19th, 2006, 10:35 AM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 796
|
Quote:
However, the current Powerbooks WILL do a nice job with HDV. It's best to go ahead and get the Macbook Pro however because it's much more powerful than the PPC based Powerbooks. You CAN also use an HDV IO with the current Powerbooks, such as the AJA Io which works over FW 400. In my opinion, the 15" Macbook Pro is a stop gap measure. Something to get the MacIntels out into the real world. The 17" Macbook Pro is in the works right now as is an Intel Mac Mini. Both of these hold a lot of promise for future HD content management and production. If you need HDV capabilities right now, get a 17" powerbook and max the RAM. If you need HDV capabilities realativel soon, get the current Macbook Pro and wait 'til March when a Universal FCP is released. If you can wait a little longer, get the 17" Macbook Pro.
__________________
Dave Perry Cinematographer LLC Director of Photography • Editor • Digital Film Production • 540.915.2752 • daveperry.net |
|
February 19th, 2006, 05:10 PM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
|
|
February 19th, 2006, 06:30 PM | #12 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
Quote:
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
|
February 19th, 2006, 10:40 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
William: this is a dual-core desktop system with no special video acceleration card installed. I get real-time editing results on the computer monitor using HDV footage converted to the Canopus HQ editing codec, plus I can view the results in real time on my HDTV if I connect to it using the component outputs on an ATI All-in-Wonder video card. You could also buy Edius NX with the optional Expansion Kit for better real-time HD component output, and that's currently the best value available for an HDV editing solution with live HD monitoring.
|
| ||||||
|
|