|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 19th, 2006, 01:42 AM | #1 |
Posts: n/a
|
interlaced to progressive
Is it possible to get good progressive at post from an interlaced footage? Equal to a native progressive shooting?
Or to go to 24p or 25p from 60i/50i isn't it the same that shooting progressive? What can we count? The results will be below? Not so progressive or film-like? Will it imply resolution losses like vertical one, for instance? What is the best editing solution to achieve the best progressive workflow with film-look from an interlaced stream? What is the best affordable software provider? Acceptable to 35mm film-out? Last edited by Guest; January 19th, 2006 at 05:07 AM. |
January 19th, 2006, 08:44 PM | #2 |
Hawaiian Shirt Mogul
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: northern cailfornia
Posts: 1,261
|
"Is it possible to get good progressive at post from an interlaced footage? Equal to a native progressive shooting?"
NO not equal "Or to go to 24p or 25p from 60i/50i isn't it the same that shooting progressive? What can we count? The results will be below? Not so progressive or film-like?" it will be progressive but you loose a little in the 60i to 24p conversion "Will it imply resolution losses like vertical one, for instance?" there is always resolution lost .. less or more depends on method used to create the progressive "What is the best editing solution to achieve the best progressive workflow with film-look from an interlaced stream? What is the best affordable software provider?" most tape to film transfer houses have their own software/hardware methods... for home use a few years ago there was a test done on different ways .. i believe using 2 of "revisions" plug ins came out the best. "Acceptable to 35mm film-out?" Yes !! until the panasonic dvx 100 came out all video had to be 60i to 24p converted .. orginal 4:2:2 media has excellent results .. DVX has very good results ,, DV good .... but it all is dependent on how it's lit, exposed etc |
January 19th, 2006, 08:51 PM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,797
|
You don't mention what computer platform you use. DVfilm Maker runs under both Windows and MacOSX: http://www.dvfilm.com/maker/
The same company also does 35mm transfers: http://www.dvfilm.com/faq.htm On the Mac you might take a look at Graeme Nattress' Film Effects: http://www.nattress.com/filmEffects.htm You can download free trials of both these packages and see what you thing for yourself. |
January 19th, 2006, 10:38 PM | #4 | |||
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you Don!
Quote:
Will it be relevant? Where? Quote:
What's the better method? Quote:
Last edited by Guest; January 19th, 2006 at 11:16 PM. |
|||
January 19th, 2006, 10:40 PM | #5 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you Boyd!
Quote:
Will it be better to go to PC where I can have the DVfilm Maker? Or Graeme Nattress' Film Effects has better results? |
|
January 20th, 2006, 10:11 PM | #6 |
Hawaiian Shirt Mogul
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: northern cailfornia
Posts: 1,261
|
|
January 21st, 2006, 02:21 AM | #7 |
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for the helpful link, I will check out!
|
January 21st, 2006, 06:51 AM | #8 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
Edius, and ProCoderExpress that is bundled with it, can do the conversion to and from HDV Type 1 and 2 and HD formats. As to whether it will do it to a 35mm film out standard, I have no idea. |
|
January 21st, 2006, 09:07 PM | #9 |
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for the tip!
|
January 22nd, 2006, 03:08 AM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,669
|
Just FYI, I notice that Coplan's review didn't include Magic Bullet: http://www.redgiantsoftware.com/magbulsuit.html
MB is very, very good ... certainly better than Procoder which I use .... but also very slow and probably not what you would call "affordable" ($800). |
| ||||||
|
|