|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 3rd, 2005, 08:35 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Budapest , Hungary
Posts: 194
|
Cinema Disp or LCD TV
Which one would you guys suggest to use as preview monitor ???
The Cinema Display is 1920x1200 so you can see every pixel of the Z1, when the LCD TV is only 1280x720 but the LCD TV is not a computer monitor so should be better for color correction, correct ?? Any ideas here pls... |
May 3rd, 2005, 09:03 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
If you can lift heavy weights and have the space, a nice 30 inch tube HDTV is not that expensive, and works great.
|
May 3rd, 2005, 09:33 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Budapest , Hungary
Posts: 194
|
Unfortunatly that kind of TV is not an option to me....it is either lcd tv or the a big screen lcd computer monitor.
|
May 3rd, 2005, 12:47 PM | #4 |
Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1
|
Big tube CRT would be nice.... but how would you connect it to your Mac to view the desktop cinema preview in FCP? Or would you need a costly extra card (like AJA)?
|
May 5th, 2005, 03:17 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St.Louis, USA
Posts: 145
|
Sony Fx1,FCP5, MAC, 30"LCD way to go
I bought MAC G5 with 30" LCD. Its expensive LCD i'm happy with it. I can see much more detail and difference from anyother monitors. At work i have expensive 20" CRT. But i was able to see much more detail of the same picture in my LCD panel. I would suggest LCD.
|
May 5th, 2005, 06:30 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 80
|
LCD's generally show sharper edges / more contrast but are less effective in accurately rendering color. OTOH, a lot of HD will end up being veiwed with LCD technology.
For photographic prints I think CRT is still significantly ahead, especially when one adds in cost, for video I am less clear. my 2 NZ cents Andrew
__________________
http://www.ps-scripts.com/ Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz, 2x 2Gb Ram, ATI Radeon HD 3850 |
May 6th, 2005, 01:18 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Northridge Ca
Posts: 734
|
Gabor, if you can locate a May issue of DV magazine, there is an article in there by Adam Wilt which exposes a lot of the "gotchas" in dealing with HDV, including monitor selection and how to get your video to the external monitor, which is not simple, as has been suggested earlier. They may post the article on the DV mag website: www.dv.com
__________________
Wayne If it was easy, they'd get a relative to do it. |
May 6th, 2005, 01:22 PM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
At a show yesterday, I ran across a video card for the PC that has a Component Out on a breakout box. Under $300 and works with the Cineform AVI. Check out the Nvidia Quadro FX 540 - looks pretty good and worth a shot.
|
May 6th, 2005, 07:05 PM | #9 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I have a 17" Sony 16:9 LCD monitor at 1280x720 and a 22" Samsung 16:9 LCD TV at 1280x720. They may work well for your use but just be aware of a couple things.
First, they overscan like all consumer TV's, unless you hook them up via DVI or VGA. This may not really be such a big deal. But regarding the 22" Samsung; I really like the image on this screen but 1280x720 looks like a very low resolution display in this size when using as a computer monitor. You'll feel like you're reading the large print edition of everything! But using it strictly as a video monitor while editing works very well. Just realize the 1280x720 is a much, much lower pixel density than the Apple display of about the same size. |
May 6th, 2005, 07:52 PM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Katoomba NSW Australia
Posts: 635
|
Quote:
I'm actually a deserter from the "CRT HDTV is superior to LCD HDTV camp", having gone from a Panasonic 76cm CRT HDTV to a Sharp Aquos 83cm LCD HDTV. I'm not sure our choices for how we decide to go about our purchases should be determined by the mindset of an industry that, (while we may admire it) has no respect for what HDV implies. The whole reason for 'preview monitoring' is geared to a process that doesn't have the flexibility that HDV can deliver. Many people are going to find that for previewing their clips, they'll use the camera's own LCD panel, rather than take the time to set up the full monitoring equipment, or they'll just use a WS laptop to preview 'in the field' if they have too... So... maybe you should take a look at both of your monitor choices; and imagine which one you'd much rather be using all the time, to watch all your HD stuff on. |
|
May 9th, 2005, 05:40 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Budapest , Hungary
Posts: 194
|
How about this 26" JVC LCD TV for not a bad price...:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=376377&is=REG Gabor |
May 9th, 2005, 06:21 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 704
|
The best LCD I've seen out there for the money is the 24" Dell LCD monitor.
It has the same resolution as the Apple 23", a slightly larger screen, and apparently better contrast. And it's cheaper. Check it out here It lists on Dell's site for 1,199 right now. But I've seen them offer rebates in the past. Another great resource for LCD info in terms of HD editing is at: www.hdforindies.com I think Mike covered the topic in his FAQ on that site.
__________________
Luis Caffesse Pitch Productions Austin, Texas |
May 19th, 2005, 10:50 AM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 79
|
What about a small 16x9 like this one:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=262238&is=REG from Sony? That's what I'm putting on my wish list since my boss said I could get an HD monitor for editing... |
May 19th, 2005, 09:28 PM | #14 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I could be wrong, but I don't think that's a 16:9 monitor. It looks like a 4:3 native screen that can display HD in letterboxed mode. Don't know what your definition of "small" is... It's about 14"x17"x11" and weighs 37.5 lbs! :-)
It appears that you need to add a card if you want to use this for HD, and that costs another $3,200. And for an extra $185 they will sell you a mask to cover the top and bottom of the 4:3 screen and make it appear to be 16:9. Not trying to knock it down, it's probably great. But it's going to cost around $5,000. |
May 19th, 2005, 10:21 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 79
|
Right on all counts, Boyd. I jumped the gun in suggesting that one without reading the fine print, or even looking at the photo, as it were. Sorry about that!
|
| ||||||
|
|