|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 4th, 2007, 04:47 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 740
|
h264's quality not up to expectations
Everyone rants and raves about how beautiful and wonderful h264 renders out video but I am still scratching my head. Every time I use it the image gets very washed out. I understand it is worlds smaller file size wise, but the image looks so much worse than an avi. Can anyone chime in on this and set me straight? Will it always look washed out?
www.kiukle.com/temp/h264.jpg
__________________
Cinematography Site |
|
|
|
December 4th, 2007, 05:52 PM
|
#2 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Nathan:
Better state your specs, OS, editor, and where the codec is derived from. I ve noticed similar issues trying to edit and render on PC side using Quicktime codecs, and I'm guessing it extends to H264 stuff.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
|
|
|
December 4th, 2007, 08:16 PM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 740
|
PC with win XP using premiere pro 2 and AE CS2. the codec is in Premiere, AE, i`ve run it out with errr....i fogot the name right now....Framework something, and through Tmpgenc 4 with the same exact results
__________________
Cinematography Site |
|
|
|
|
December 11th, 2007, 11:49 AM
|
#4 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,116
|
Quality settings vastly influence the final result. Please give us more details about the settings that you used.
|
|
|
|
|
December 11th, 2007, 01:38 PM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Warwick, Rhode Island
Posts: 740
|
highest quality. Thats the only setting it has. It has a bar from low quality > highest.
__________________
Cinematography Site |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
