|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 15th, 2008, 01:04 PM | #16 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Quote:
I look forward to see what is possible! |
|
September 4th, 2008, 04:42 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 187
|
Hi Chris,
We are planning to shoot something on a Red One camera, but trying to avoid as much accessory costs as possible. How would you compare the fluid movements of the Hercules 2.0 (when mounted with a camera) to some other popular tripod heads? Any disadvantages to using the Hercules as a camera head? We are trying to keep the rig as lightweight as possible - probably about 15-17 lbs. Thanks, |
September 4th, 2008, 05:48 PM | #18 | |
Sponsor: Kessler Crane
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Webster, IN
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Hopefully some of our customers see this thread and provide feedback, so you can get a input from a customer's perspective. We feel that the Hercules 2.0 provides just as smooth of movement as the other popular tripod heads. It may not look as fancy or have all the bells and whistles as the other tripod head, but we made sure the functionality of the head is there. Remember, the head is designed to support and function smoothly with the weight of a crane rig, so supporting the Red One rig should be no problem at all. If you have any other questions, just let me know. Feel free to drop me an e-mail or give Eric a call at the shop, if you would like. Thanks |
|
| ||||||
|
|