|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 5th, 2007, 08:57 AM
|
#1 |
|
Ruler of the DownUnder UnderWorld
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cairns- Queensland - Australia
Posts: 248
|
EDIUS Has Done It
Well we started with Premiere Pro/Aspect HD but ended up re doing it all with EDIUS using the Canopus HQ codec.
Here is a sneak peek at out new underwater DVD coming out soon shot with HDV cameras. http://www.hdvunderwater.com/ningaloo/ningaloodvd.htm |
|
|
|
February 5th, 2007, 09:13 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: West Sussex England
Posts: 843
|
As an edius user from the start, well done should be a winner for you
Regards Mick |
|
|
|
|
February 5th, 2007, 08:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burbank
Posts: 1,811
|
Looks Great! What camera/cameras did you use?
|
|
|
|
|
February 6th, 2007, 01:26 AM
|
#4 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
Is there a reason why you switched from an editing program/codec to another ?
|
|
|
|
|
February 6th, 2007, 03:15 AM
|
#5 |
|
Ruler of the DownUnder UnderWorld
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cairns- Queensland - Australia
Posts: 248
|
Cheers
Used a FX1 and A1 in Amphibico Phenom & EVO housings. We changed codecs from Prem Pro & Aspect HD because..... Could convert to the Canopus HQ in realtime on our 3 GIG PC. Better realtime, vary Colour Correction. Better realtime, vary slow mo. Less banding in openwater shots with CC added. Better m2t out encodes with Procoder Express. Progressive DVD MPEG2 spec files straight out from the timeline. We did lots of side by side tests on the same footage to compare. Even my non editing partner could see the difference. I found these two m2t clips to compare... 21 megs each, have a look. http://www.hdvunderwater.com/videoclips/aspect.m2t http://www.hdvunderwater.com/videoclips/edius.m2t |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
