|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 6th, 2006, 05:46 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sitka Alaska
Posts: 128
|
ADS converter api555 vs Canopus 110,
HI
Has anyone done any tests comparing the quality of the analog conversion on the ADS api 555 vs the canopus 110 or any of the other standalone converter boxes. Any comments on other than convenience, the quality difference vs simply using the analog in to dv out on a camcorder? Thanks Sharyn |
August 8th, 2006, 10:45 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
Douglas Spotted Eagle did some testing with several analog-DV adaptors a few years ago, results here http://www.sundancemediagroup.com/articles/ADSlink.htm
On the basis of this I bought a Canopus ADVC100, which I've been very happy with. I understand that the 110 is the same codec. Not familiar with the latest ADS products. Canopus also has the ADVC300, which includes a timebase corrector, handy if you're transferring old VHS that might have been poorly recorded. |
August 9th, 2006, 02:33 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sitka Alaska
Posts: 128
|
IF you use analog to digital in a camcorder with TBC
Thanks Seth, Interesting link. DSE does the usual good job.
This then leads to the next question. The SONY digital 8 line have a built in TBC, Do you or anyone else know if the TBC function is in the data path with analog in to dv out, or is it only in the path from the hi 8 tape? Sharyn |
August 9th, 2006, 11:18 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
No idea about whether you'd get TBC using Dig 8 as a pass-through device. If you could find a repair tech with a service manual it would probably be pretty easy to determine...
|
| ||||||
|
|