|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 12th, 2007, 09:38 AM | #31 | ||
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,800
|
Quote:
We're getting pretty far from the topic of this thread, and I'll admit that I'm largely to blame for that.... sorry. But I think the discussion has been civil and it should provide a bit of perspective on why FCP for Windows isn't likely to appear anytime soon. Quote:
|
||
January 17th, 2007, 03:28 AM | #32 |
Tourist
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
|
Hmmm, prior to the advent of the i-pod and i-tunes Apple was drawing most of its' profit from software licenses (Quicktime technology). Don't forget that Apple has been in the PC market for some time with its' database software Filemaker. It's also worth noting that more than a few folks running FMP on Macs have complained that with the latest versions of FMP (7, 8 and 8.5) Apple has been favoring the PC side; perhaps because PC sales outstrip sales for Apple platforms. As the number of Apple machines continues to shrink (there are more people running Windows 98 and ME than there are using OSX) I have no doubt that Apple will start looking at the PC market very seriously - money is money.
|
January 17th, 2007, 09:18 AM | #33 | |||
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,800
|
Quote:
I am really happy with Filemaker 8.5 myself. We also deployed a new machine (a Dell server maxxed out with RAM and fast SCSI drives) running Filemaker server 8 and that thing really flies. They have done terrific job optimizing the server, which used to be a real dog in earlier versions. Now my database (which is big, with almost 400 fields and thousands of records) is just as responsive over the network as it is on a local machine, and it's nearly as fast running remotely over DSL as it is on the office LAN. But my experience is really quite the opposite with the Mac vs PC versions. There are few bugs when running on the PC (or should I say "features") which I haven't been able to resolve yet. Specifically, there are things which don't print correctly under Windows XP, and out IT guys are as baffled as me. Then there's also the fact that PDF's are supported in the Mac version in ways which don't work on the PC, since PDF is a native file format for OSX. BTW, Apple spun off FileMaker, Inc. as a subsidiary a number of years ago, although they are wholly owned by Apple. Quote:
http://www.forbes.com/home/technolog...0117apple.html Quote:
|
|||
January 17th, 2007, 04:02 PM | #34 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,800
|
Just to update the notion that Apple's sales are shrinking... from today's earnings report:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...yhoo&dist=yhoo Quote:
|
|
January 19th, 2007, 02:42 PM | #35 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
-A |
|
January 23rd, 2007, 03:21 PM | #36 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 222
|
I would seriously consider fully reading and following these steps:
http://uneasysilence.com/os-x-proven...n-ordinary-pc/ **** Jobs, he's always been a proprietary dork when compared to Gates, and for some reason everybody thinks he's this nice guy...well he ain't, he's a greedy and controlling DRM cyborg |
January 23rd, 2007, 06:15 PM | #37 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
Quote:
Apple has taken ownership of everything in your computer (assuming you buy through them)...they generally will help you troubleshoot other companies products as well. In order to do this, they have to keep control over the whole package. Which brings us back to the initial point of this thread...the software they write is there to serve the hardware they've tested and chose to be the foundation of the Apple experience...even their packaging espouses this holistic approach to their computer lifestyle they are selling. <rant> If you want a PC...buy a PC, stop trying to tell apple what to do...they're doing more for their shareholders right now than most other tech companies...and doing it by doing more for their customers. If they were just any software company...or just any PC manufacturer, they would be competing in a whole different marketplace...one that is already choked with dell and gateway and HP and John Franklin's Discount PC House Custom Cheese Log Powered Windows Box which eventually you find out doesn't have a license to sell Windows from Microsoft...thereby putting you in violation of licensing agreements with MS and having their lawyers stomp on you after the napster police come and steal your daughters for dowloading the newest Jessie McCarthy track from some server in poland. If you want Final Cut, Get a Mac...Buy a second drive to put windows on so you can play your games that you will lose out on by switching to the Mac...every other piece of software on your windows machine can be replaced with a mac friendly analogue. In case you can't tell, this discussion frustrates me...mods, feel free to kill this post, but dangit...show me your business acumen before complaining about being wronged by Mr. Jobs and his cohorts. While everyone else was floundering, he found a new way to get it done. </rant> |
|
January 23rd, 2007, 07:33 PM | #38 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,800
|
OK, OK. I've been guilty of fueling the fire here myself but it seemed like we were having an interesting discussion about the differences between Macs and PC's without getting into a platform war.
But I think this thread has now run its course. There really isn't much more to say about the topic of "Final Cut Studio for the PC platform." So let's move on to something else... |
| ||||||
|
|