|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 18th, 2006, 03:42 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 52
|
Any direct-to-disk solutions for recording uncompressed?
I'm curious. At the high end of the industry (Viper, CineAlta) are there any direct-to-disk RAID array portable solutions for recording uncompressed 10 bit 4:2:2 or even 4:4:4, accepting the signal from the camera via HD-SDI or Dual Link HD-SDI?
|
January 18th, 2006, 04:24 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV / Branson, MO
Posts: 63
|
Not any ones that are economic. I guess the Wafian is the closest, but it's not uncompressed nor portable in a sense of running around with it.
I have a feeling that the best solution might be a custom made one, where you take a portable computer based system outfitted with a RAID and SDI capture card (8 or 10 bit, 4:2:2 or 4:4:4) and then power the whole thing with DC power. Not a terribly practical setup but it's probably the closest thing to a portable recorder that you're going to come across without spending huge bucks. Maybe I'm not considering something, don't take my word as if it were carved on stone... |
January 18th, 2006, 08:50 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
The Wafian or QSOL tools are not horribly expensive, but past that...figure a quarter mil just for storage, and it's the size of a small under-bar refrigerator. This isn't an easy task in the field, simply because of lacking power and bus speed on a laptop. But I'm pretty certain you could build a drive array using SATA, and feed it with some light compression format.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
January 18th, 2006, 10:30 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Posts: 548
|
Quote:
At PixelCorps, we typically shoot with a CineAlta F950, capturing 4:4:4 to a HUGE Systems RAID array via a Kona2 on a Dual G5 Power Mac running Final Cut. We've used XRAIDs from Apple as well, but they barely keep up at 24p. The HUGE Systems 4106 Media Vault seems to keep up with little effort. The resulting quicktime files can be edited as needed. On the PC, you'd need to download AJA's codec, but then just about any NLE that support QuickTime files should be able to work with the video files. I've even worked with these on little-'ole Ulead Media Studio Pro. At the moment, there's nothing "camcorder portable" though. Too much storage space, horsepower, and associated cooling is needed to digest data at these rates. |
|
January 18th, 2006, 12:44 PM | #5 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
So a lot depends on your definition of "portable." |
|
January 18th, 2006, 01:14 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
|
i believe that an engineer here on dvinfo is currently designing a portable 4:2:2(?) recorder.
|
January 18th, 2006, 02:08 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St. John's, NL, Canada
Posts: 416
|
Ya that engineer fellow would likely be me :)
Check out the website, drop me an email with comments or design ideas or if you wish to be in the beta group. The first prototype is being built this month so I'm rather excited. Edit: Ya, 4:2:2 for the standalone deck, but its fairly open. I'm planning on a dual link setup so two can be connected in parallel for portable (beit a little heavier) high def 4:4:4 12 bit per channel uncompressed.
__________________
www.engr.mun.ca/~wakeham/index.htm |
January 18th, 2006, 04:33 PM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 1,315
|
As for codec's how about sheervideo's?
http://www.bitjazz.com/sheervideo/ Avids ? "Avid DNxHD 145 8-bit media delivers HD quality while requiring approximately 20% less storage capacity than 8-bit uncompressed standard definition media." Cineform ProspectHD? Sounds great but it isn't sold on its own. Visually lossless at 10bit and can capture to a single drive is quite amazing, but requires fair bit of CPU. Too bad they restrict AspectHD from capturing SDI. It would be a phenominal low cost solution where portability is concerned. Dang Cineform, dang! (said in Napoleon Dynamite voice :) What about HuffYUV?
__________________
Damnit Jim, I'm a film maker not a sysytems tech. |
January 19th, 2006, 06:44 AM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 376
|
Quote:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showpost....08&postcount=7 |
|
January 19th, 2006, 04:30 PM | #10 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
http://www.cineform.com/index.asp |
|
January 19th, 2006, 06:02 PM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 1,315
|
Um, yeah good work. It didn't used to be.
$3499 USD puts it in a price bracket all its own. Ouch!
__________________
Damnit Jim, I'm a film maker not a sysytems tech. |
January 20th, 2006, 03:31 PM | #12 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
|
Quote:
i don't know any of the specific details, but i believe that keith designed his own chipset for the video recorder we are talking about... as i understand it, there isn't anything else on the market today that is comparable to what his company is doing right now... and it's at a quality/price point that will blow hdv clean out of the water. and if it all pans out, i'll be right there going "i told you so", lol. |
|
January 20th, 2006, 04:01 PM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 1,315
|
Dan, everyone of the codecs mentioned would still need hardware.
The Wafian is exactly the setup Cineform offers for this task, but you could build your own PC if wanted. The beauty of ProspectHD solution it it can capture its 10bit visually lossless codec to a single drive! Amazing, as heavy duty RAID solutions would be the bulk of cost/power/size for all other solutions. I wish Cineform would list the PC specs for ingest.
__________________
Damnit Jim, I'm a film maker not a sysytems tech. |
| ||||||
|
|