|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 26th, 2005, 11:13 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
HDR-FX1 vs DVX100a 1920x1080p clip
Here is a link I found to a simple test between the FX1 and a DVX100a.
It's of a resolution chart and then a 200% blowup of the center of the chart from each camera. The Files codec is in H.264 at 1920x1080p. http://s34.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0...42ZNMO43K77NP8 |
|
|
|
May 26th, 2005, 02:30 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 500
|
I don't have that codec on computer. Can you interpret test results please.
Radek |
|
|
|
|
May 30th, 2005, 09:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 274
|
Yea I think us Windows boys need to wait for QT 7.0 to come out.
|
|
|
|
|
June 1st, 2005, 03:22 PM
|
#4 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 9
|
H.264
windows can play it, its just that quicktime is sneeky. Export your .mov as an mp4 but select PASSTHROUGH in the options for video. it will just copy the file to an mp4 container, takes about ten seconds, then it can be played on any computer fast enough to handle it Using VideoLAN.
|
|
|
|
|
June 1st, 2005, 04:55 PM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 274
|
PassThrough is greyed out. I thought I had a H.264 codec...guess not.
|
|
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2005, 11:33 AM
|
#6 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
I am putting together some pictures that illustrate more tests.
I took the above clip and made a SD DVD of the tests. Contrary to what certain people say that the FX1/Z1u is no different in quality when down-converted to SD. Those that say this, that have done the tests are in certain need of new eye's or a good pair of eye glasses. The DVD was played to a XBR 50" HD TV from a samsung DVD player using DVI output. I photographed the monitor with a Canon DSLR of the resolution tests. It's very clear that the material shot with the FX1 has more resolution etc vs what the DVX100a has even when displayed from a SD downconverted source. I also had these original frames developed at a local printing service to 8x10 film paper. The FX1 holds up very good, and the DVX100a looks bad. I will post pictures of these as well so you can see it. So if your interested to see how good the FX1/Z1u will perform, keep an eye out for my post on DVinfo.net in this thread. Michael Pappas Article on the AG-HVX200... http://www.pbase.com/aghvx200/do_hvx...ream_of_lenses HDX-200 lens good or just functional Article.... http://www.pbase.com/aghvx200/hdx200...st_functional_ SDX900 vs AG-HVX200 Article.. http://www.pbase.com/aghvx200/sdx900...llustrated_pov ARTICLE ON JVC'S HIGH DEF CAMERA THE JVCHD100u... http://www.pbase.com/aghvx200/pappasarts_entertainment_ PappasArts Entertainment-2005 http://www.Pbase.com/ARRFILMS PappasArts.com PAPPASARTS@HOTMAIL.COM |
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2005, 04:07 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
Panasonic announced that it was giving us their Golden Egg ( DVCPro HD ) on a $5,995 camera. That's their HDcam equivalent to Sony's CineAlta. If a knockout blow from Panasonic wasn't enough, they decided to add a sucker punch for added measure. Panasonic is adding 1080/24p Well, analog to digital converter after chipset only outputs 1080i and 720p, so 1080p will be interpolated, like Sony HDV CF25 is. No true 1980p at this price point, sorry. Radek |
|
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2005, 04:47 PM
|
#8 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
Radek, can you point me to a source saying that there is no 1080p? I'm interested to see it as I've heard nothing of the sort, and in fact, just the opposite.
Aaron |
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2005, 05:13 PM
|
#9 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 500
|
http://www.dvxuser.com/articles/HVX200/
You have to read between the lines. See what kind of uncompressed analog output the camera has. Radek |
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2005, 06:08 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 45
|
Qt7
Quote:
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/preview/ |
|
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2005, 07:41 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
Ahh, you mean the Digital to Analog converter, not the Analog to Digital converter?
Aaron Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2005, 08:29 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 274
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2005, 09:47 PM
|
#13 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 414
|
Any way we can get a fresh download of that footage now that we can actually view it in the PC world?
|
|
|
|
|
June 7th, 2005, 08:59 AM
|
#14 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
Your welcome Kyle!
Hi Kevin, Here is a new link to the test footage. http://s14.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0...1076DIPMIQP9LB michael pappas Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
