HDV's mpeg2+mpeg2 v.s. DV's dv + mpeg2 workflow at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > High Definition Video Acquisition > General HD (720 / 1080) Acquisition
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

General HD (720 / 1080) Acquisition
Topics about HD production.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 15th, 2004, 05:21 AM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 445
HDV's mpeg2+mpeg2 v.s. DV's dv + mpeg2 workflow

When its all said and done whats truely going to look better on DVD? - HDV's mpeg2 or regular cameras like the XL2 or DVX100a with DV's standard compression?

(Keep in mind that HDV is forced to down res to 720X480 and compress yet again with MPEG2 to meet DVD's maximum standards)

Rather than turn this into a hypothetical numbers discusion lets see some FULL resolution frame grabs from the camera and then apply DVD's mpeg2 compression to it and repost the example here on this thread.
Brett Erskine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2004, 10:07 AM   #2
Barry Wan Kenobi
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
The proper camera to do that test with isn't on the market yet: the Sony FX1. Give it a month, and when it comes out, then we can run the test.

Using the FX1 will let you know because you'll be using the same camera, the same CCD's, the same everything, just changing the internal recording format from HDV to DV.
Barry Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2004, 02:11 PM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 236
Brett,

That's really a no-brainer without the photographic proof. You're taking 720p or 1080i and downconverting it to 480i/p vs taking 480i DV and converting it to 480i/p MPEG2.

The higher resolution source will always win out, period.

I've done many tests with my HD1. I've compared the 4:3 640X480i to the 16:9 720X480i to the 720X480p MPEG2 and finally the 1280X720p all converted to 720X480i MPEG2 DVD. The higher res 720p wins out on final quality everytime.

I've done those tests with hardware MPEG2 decoders on a standalone DVD recorder as well as three different software decoders including MainConcepts MPEG Encoder (one of the best), Ulead's DVD Workshop 2 and a cheaper Roxio MPEG encoder.

Quote:
(Keep in mind that HDV is forced to down res to 720X480 and compress yet again with MPEG2 to meet DVD's maximum standards)
Keep in mind that when you start will less (DV) and have to compress it (MPEG2) you'll end up with less.

Also, doing screen grabs doesn't show you motion artifacts that would be inherent to the downconversion.

Troy
Troy Lamont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 18th, 2004, 10:41 AM   #4
Trustee
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,055
Troy,.

So from the perspecitve of work flow, is there a difference between editing HD footage then downconverting for DVD authoring, or just downconverting to 720x480 first and then editing and then authoring on DVD?
Dennis Hingsberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 18th, 2004, 11:42 AM   #5
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
usually the final conversion is done AFTER any editing.
It is editing which brings losses.
So if you start high, convert to SD and edit it, there is no gain.
You already bring you signal to maximum quality possible for DV (that is pretty low), and editing it will only bring you to a "less than maximum".
In the contrary, editing an hi-quality signal, will probably bring less damages to the signal than will the final conversion to DV.
If working HD is not affordable for you, you can choose for a SD resolution with hi quality codec (like DVCpro50).
This keeps the filesize reasonable and works in regular resolution while keeping a better than DV quality.
Giroud Francois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 18th, 2004, 02:40 PM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 236
Dennis,

Pretty much what Giroud stated.

I'd throw in a tidbit.

If you have DVD authoring software that allows you to only encode the MPEG2 edits and not re-encode the entire project that's already DVD ready, then it's pretty much a standoff. You can do the downconvert first with no additional huge tradeoffs in res if you're comfortable using the MPEG2 editor vs one that does TS natively.

Troy
Troy Lamont is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > High Definition Video Acquisition > General HD (720 / 1080) Acquisition


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network