$200k Fine at DVinfo.net

Ed Roo · January 18th, 2017, 12:48 PM

The FAA just issued the largest fine ever against a company for flying drones illegally
In October, the FAA proposed a $1.9 million fine, but today announced the fine would only be $200,000.
by April Glaser@aprilaser Jan 17, 2017, 2:22pm EST
Drew Angerer / Getty Images

The Federal Aviation Administration announced today that it will fine SkyPan International of Chicago, a drone company, $200,000 for conducting 65 illegal drone flights in congested airspace over Chicago and New York City. It’s the largest civil penalty the FAA has issued against a drone operator to date.

Originally, the FAA proposed a $1.9 million fine against SkyPan in October. Recode reached out to the FAA to ask why the final settlement is dramatically lower than the previously proposed fine, but did not immediately hear back.

SkyPan advertises itself as an aerial imaging company that can capture a “bird’s-eye view” that’s useful in “dense, urban environments” for developers and architects planning new projects.

The illegal flights were conducted between 2012 and 2014, and the FAA alleged in October that the company was operating drones without proper FAA clearance in some of the country’s most congested airspace. SkyPan was further accused of operating its aircraft without proper communication tools and without receiving an airworthiness certificate and registration.

In addition to the $200,000 fine, the agency announced an additional $150,000 fine SkyPan will be responsible for if it violates FAA rules again in the next year and another $150,000 fine if the company fails to comply with the settlement agreement. SkyPan is also required to work with the FAA to release three public service announcements over the next year to promote FAA rules. In exchange for the fine, the FAA “will make no finding of violation,” according to a statement from SkyPan.

SkyPan’s flights were conducted before the FAA issued its commercial drone operator rules in August 2016, prior to which special FAA clearance was required for commercial drone flights.

The FAA was expected to release its proposal for rules that would clarify how drones are allowed to fly over populated areas in December 2016, but that didn’t happen.

Earlier this month at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said that in 2016 airplane pilots reported 1,800 drone sightings, up from 1,200 drone sightings in 2015. Drone operators are required to avoid flying near other aircraft to prevent a collision in flight, which could cause substantial damage and even bring down a plane.

https://www.recode.net/2017/1/17/142...ource=facebook

Cliff Totten · April 2nd, 2017, 01:59 PM

FAA "rules" were broken. But, were any "laws" broken?

I dont believe "laws" and "rules" are the same thing. "Laws" are developed in the legislative branch of govt as bills, voted on, passed and finally signed into law with an executive branch signature. Can the FAA just create and approve its own custom "laws" today?

Where am i going wrong?

Jim Michael · April 2nd, 2017, 02:17 PM

This might help https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...civil_penalty/

Jim Andrada · May 28th, 2017, 06:38 PM

In a word, "Yes!"

There are proceedures to be followed, but having followed them the FAA can indeed make enforceable rules.

January 18th, 2017, 12:48 PM	#1
Ed Roo Major Player Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Columbus USA Posts: 312	$200k Fine The FAA just issued the largest fine ever against a company for flying drones illegally In October, the FAA proposed a $1.9 million fine, but today announced the fine would only be $200,000. by April Glaser@aprilaser Jan 17, 2017, 2:22pm EST Drew Angerer / Getty Images The Federal Aviation Administration announced today that it will fine SkyPan International of Chicago, a drone company, $200,000 for conducting 65 illegal drone flights in congested airspace over Chicago and New York City. It’s the largest civil penalty the FAA has issued against a drone operator to date. Originally, the FAA proposed a $1.9 million fine against SkyPan in October. Recode reached out to the FAA to ask why the final settlement is dramatically lower than the previously proposed fine, but did not immediately hear back. SkyPan advertises itself as an aerial imaging company that can capture a “bird’s-eye view” that’s useful in “dense, urban environments” for developers and architects planning new projects. The illegal flights were conducted between 2012 and 2014, and the FAA alleged in October that the company was operating drones without proper FAA clearance in some of the country’s most congested airspace. SkyPan was further accused of operating its aircraft without proper communication tools and without receiving an airworthiness certificate and registration. In addition to the $200,000 fine, the agency announced an additional $150,000 fine SkyPan will be responsible for if it violates FAA rules again in the next year and another $150,000 fine if the company fails to comply with the settlement agreement. SkyPan is also required to work with the FAA to release three public service announcements over the next year to promote FAA rules. In exchange for the fine, the FAA “will make no finding of violation,” according to a statement from SkyPan. SkyPan’s flights were conducted before the FAA issued its commercial drone operator rules in August 2016, prior to which special FAA clearance was required for commercial drone flights. The FAA was expected to release its proposal for rules that would clarify how drones are allowed to fly over populated areas in December 2016, but that didn’t happen. Earlier this month at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said that in 2016 airplane pilots reported 1,800 drone sightings, up from 1,200 drone sightings in 2015. Drone operators are required to avoid flying near other aircraft to prevent a collision in flight, which could cause substantial damage and even bring down a plane. https://www.recode.net/2017/1/17/142...ource=facebook

April 2nd, 2017, 01:59 PM	#2
Cliff Totten Trustee Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 1,197	Re: $200k Fine FAA "rules" were broken. But, were any "laws" broken? I dont believe "laws" and "rules" are the same thing. "Laws" are developed in the legislative branch of govt as bills, voted on, passed and finally signed into law with an executive branch signature. Can the FAA just create and approve its own custom "laws" today? Where am i going wrong?

April 2nd, 2017, 02:17 PM	#3
Jim Michael Major Player Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 895	Re: $200k Fine This might help https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...civil_penalty/

May 28th, 2017, 06:38 PM	#4
Jim Andrada Inner Circle Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Tucson AZ Posts: 2,211	Re: $200k Fine In a word, "Yes!" There are proceedures to be followed, but having followed them the FAA can indeed make enforceable rules.