|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 30th, 2007, 05:49 AM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Simsbury, CT
Posts: 247
|
Quote:
Thanks for all the replies. Drew, do you mean that you capture as AIC? Or you capture as HDV and then convert to AIC? If the latter, how is that done? Thanks. |
|
May 30th, 2007, 07:05 AM | #17 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
I capture to HDV and then use Batch Export feature to convert all clips to DVCProHD (720p). On a quad G5 it takes roughly 2:1 realtime (2 min/1 min). If my sequence uses lots of overlays and intricate, detailed graphics I batch export to AIC instead. |
|
May 30th, 2007, 07:09 AM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Simsbury, CT
Posts: 247
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30th, 2007, 07:12 AM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 70
|
Turbo 264 fun
Just bought an Elgato Turbo264 USB stick...
DVCPro 720p/24 to... iPod Standard (640x480): 17 FPS (!) iPod Regular (320x240): 60 FPS (!!) AppleTV (800x480): 17 FPS (!) Those encode time clearly beat Compressor. The files are also 5-10% smaller. Quality is the same as Compressor multipass. So far, so good! |
May 31st, 2007, 10:46 AM | #20 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
I find that DVCProHD is better to work with because 1) Each frame is individual; 2) FCP runs faster with DVCProHD workflow. I find that converting interlaced to progressive sacrifices a bit in image quality. That said, if you want to go to 720p then the better compromise is 720p60 from 1080i60. best regards |
|
| ||||||
|
|