|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 30th, 2007, 12:28 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 319
|
FCP Movies vs Timeline for DVDs & Back to Tape
Is there any substantive, established reason for preferring either FCP Movies or straight-from-the-timeline when exporting to Compressor for DVDs?
Any different reason for using either when sending back to tape for archiving? thanks, elmer |
April 30th, 2007, 05:49 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 239
|
I've always had success creating a Quicktime reference movies of current settings and dropping that into Compressor
Same with going out to tape |
May 1st, 2007, 06:42 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 319
|
Do you mean you didn't check the standalone box?
Because I read somewhere ages ago that going from the timeline to Compressor produced slightly better quality than standalone FCP movies. I wish someone could explain why!! Or say that's not true. The problem with archiving to tape from the timeline is that it occasionally stops and you have to start over. With a new tape. It's very frustrating. |
May 1st, 2007, 07:08 PM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,801
|
Yes, print to video can be very problematic in my experience. The same drive which works fine for capturing and editing may not work with the print to video command without dropping frames. This has been discussed in various other threads here. However, making a self-contained Quicktime file and dropping that into a new sequence will usually fix any print to video problems, but of course it takes extra time to export the file and extra disk space to store it.
|
May 1st, 2007, 08:59 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 319
|
Thanks for the info!
However, is it true that in making a self-contained movie all of your footage will be rendered to that file, including titles, filters, transitions, etc. adding a generation before sending it back to tape, i.e. a slightly lower quality final version? thanks, elmer |
May 2nd, 2007, 09:45 AM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 239
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|