|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 22nd, 2007, 06:29 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Roseville, Ca
Posts: 55
|
final cut pro 5.x HDV rendering
Hi all,
Was wondering if you were all experiencing the same thing. If I have an HDV clip and just want to cut it with the blade tool final cut pro wants me to re-render the clip is something you have had happen also. I do have filters on the clip but I thought once its rendered its rendered. Any help? |
April 22nd, 2007, 08:30 PM | #2 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fargo
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
However, a cool trick I use to view non-rendered transitions, filters, etc... is to press Option+P and it will play back your timeline in "pseudo" real time. That way you see if the changes you made are the right look without having to wait for a render. That way I can make changes to my heart's content and don't have the downtime of waiting to render every small change. Then I just render the entire clip before I export. Real time saver. Grant |
|
April 24th, 2007, 12:48 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vittsjö, SKÅNE, SWEDEN
Posts: 266
|
Hi Jourdan,
This is due to the nature of HDV; compression are made between a bunch of frames called GOP (group of pictures). A group starts with an I-frame which contains all information in the picture (compressed) then the rest of the frames only need to contain changes to the I-frame and not fully pictures to save space on the media. (This is why you can have four times more resolution in the HDV images than on DV images and still not use more bandwith/space. This also explains why HDV is much more sensitive to drop-outs. But DV is only compressed inside each frame.) When you use the razor tool you cut away the existent I-frame. So FCP now has to recalculate the frames to get a cut starting with all information it needs for the first frame. Otherwise you may get a cut starting with blocky frames which are not complete until you get to the next I-frame. Hope you could understand this. /Johan Last edited by Johan Forssblad; April 24th, 2007 at 10:09 AM. |
April 24th, 2007, 09:44 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Roseville, Ca
Posts: 55
|
Thanks alot guys. Makes perfect sense.
|
April 24th, 2007, 10:50 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fargo
Posts: 108
|
Johan's answer gave a nice "behind the scene's" description. I've wondered what the reason was, I just knew it required re-render when altering, not why it did. Thanks for that detailed answer.
Does the Option+P trick work with HDV? Grant |
April 24th, 2007, 01:23 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: LA CA
Posts: 317
|
I used to capture HDV via the SDI port and then transcode to DVCProHD.
But since the new FCP version I find that I can capture HDV 1080f and edit it perfectly well without any delays for rendering simple cuts and trims and general alterations. Note that I have not applied any effects yet. So I personally don't experience any rendering delays attributable to this GOP business. I wonder why .... Best Harry. Mac G5 Dual. 2 gigs RAM. Decklink HD Pro (sl). |
April 25th, 2007, 01:46 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
Posts: 81
|
|
April 25th, 2007, 04:30 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 590
|
In FCS 2, the new FCP 6 will allow any HDV rendering to be rendered as ProRes 422. I think this was a great idea.
|
| ||||||
|
|