|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 9th, 2007, 03:46 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington MA, USA
Posts: 35
|
M2v coversion - 2seconds per frame?
I'm new to FCP and HD so hopefully there's something I don't know here -
Converting my HD footage, with very minor filtering, to SD m2v (for DVD) is taking a little over two seconds per frame, which is over a minute per second, an hour per minute - it would take 2 days non-stop to convert my video of one band's set at a club to DVD. I'm using the lowest settings that produced decent quality (it's rendering now so I can't look it up) but this seems awfully slow. The in-camera down-convert ( Canon XHA1 ) looked pitiful, but maybe there's something I'm missing here. Any ideas, info? Thanks |
April 9th, 2007, 04:45 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rego Park , NYC
Posts: 665
|
Just out of curiousity, what kind of Mac do you have?
|
April 9th, 2007, 06:10 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington MA, USA
Posts: 35
|
It's a G5 dual processor 2.3Ghz, 2.5GB RAM
|
April 9th, 2007, 06:55 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rego Park , NYC
Posts: 665
|
I think the issue you have is those filters---when you apply a filter to the whole movie, each frame has to be rendered...hence the long render times.
I have a 20 minutes sequence in HD from my HV20 and it looks like it will take 2.5 hours to convert it into SD DVD on Dual 2.0 G5 PowerMac with 2.5gigs of ram. "Scotty, we need more power!" |
April 9th, 2007, 11:14 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 49
|
The xha1 downconvert looks pitiful? That's a bummer. Hadn't heard this about downconverts from camera. I was hoping to start shooting hdv with my xha1 and downconvert out of camera to fcp. Was hoping to avoid rendering times and distribute in sd. Then if needed recapture for hd delivery.
|
April 10th, 2007, 06:23 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington MA, USA
Posts: 35
|
Maybe not -
I tried down-converting straight to a consumer DVD recorder and that looked good. I'm still experimenting - there might be a combination of settings or something I'm missing. GRF |
April 10th, 2007, 06:34 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
I just shot a project with the A1 in HD, and down-converted to SD in-camera,
and the footage looked fantastic. |
April 10th, 2007, 07:39 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington MA, USA
Posts: 35
|
What settings did you use?
I have tried dozens more settings and all I get is 8-blocks - it all looks viewed through a grid. Unacceptable even for iPod. Please, what capture/sequence settings? What I'm getting can't be right. GRF |
April 11th, 2007, 08:44 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington MA, USA
Posts: 35
|
Really, is it a simple preset? No one could ever use what I'm getting here.
I'm wondering if something is wrong with the camera. |
April 11th, 2007, 01:34 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington MA, USA
Posts: 35
|
Hours more variations, the same 8 by 8 pixel blocks, no relief, no help.
Unusable $8000 setup. I'm sure the answer is simple. |
April 11th, 2007, 02:55 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 969
|
Glenn,
Try dropping your HD timeline into an SD timeline and export from there. |
| ||||||
|
|