|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 7th, 2007, 07:04 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12
|
HDV / SheerVideo / Nattress / FCP - Workflow ??
Hey all,
I'm struggling a bit with finding a workflow, anyone have any suggestions please? Here's the deal... Shooting HDV 1080i60, hoping to edit in 1080i60 for fast editing and to save disk space. Then I want to drop timeline into SheerVideo timeline to render and de-interlace with nattress film effects to work with a progressive timeline for effects and final output. Is there a 29.97p setting I can work with? I want to keep pulldown via nattress film effects instead of converting to 24p so output is easy back to DVD and web. I looked at the sheervideo presets, but everything above 24p is interlaced. Is that a feature lock of FCP? Thank you! |
February 7th, 2007, 07:12 AM | #2 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12
|
I would like to keep as much quality as possible. That's why I want to work with sheervideo, uncompressed is too high a bitrate.
|
February 7th, 2007, 11:01 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 1,104
|
Sorry for hijacking your thread a bit, but I'm interested in your experience with SheerVideo codec, workflow, quality, how well do you like it things like that.
If you get some time and wouldn't mind carrying on a discussion about it please let m know. Thanks |
February 7th, 2007, 11:16 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 645
|
Chuck mate
Download the demo and thrash the pants out of it! you've been posting regarding this DI workflow for a while now ... reckon you should be posting with your conclusions any time now!! Cheers <grin> Andy |
February 7th, 2007, 11:25 AM | #5 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
I've recently switched from the PC to the MAC and I've been paranoid about installing anything that might wreak havoc on the MAC [FCP] without some feedback from someone who has used it. No users of this codec had responded to my earlier requests, Etienne is the first user I've heard mention it. I'll get to thrashing.... |
|
February 7th, 2007, 11:32 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 263
|
I've installed it and LOVE it. There is a compatibility issue with BMD (Black Magic Designs) components in the Library/Quictime folder that will cause FCP to crash on launch, but if you don't have a BMD card installed, you should be fine.
Now back to our previously scheduled thread.... |
February 8th, 2007, 02:20 AM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12
|
Hey guys,
I tried the demo first, but I don't think the demo allows work with HD. I didn't find any other solution, so just went ahead and got it, mac intel version literally came out only a couple days ago. I previously took some m2t files from the hard disk recorder (FS-4 HD) and converted it to HDV for FCP with MPEG steamclip. There was too much quality loss. That's when I started looking for another codec. Since then the hard disk recorder now supports native HDV quicktime, but I still see too much quality loss after I render simple effects. So, testing out with the sheer codec compared to HDV, I don't see the same loss now. I'm EXTREMELY happy. The test for me is when I render a Nattress effect in native HDV, and then in sheer. It looks SO much better in a sheervideo timeline instead of native HDV. I tested to see differences in final output to 720p H.264 Now to have to work with all that extra data, I found this cheap raid from Lacie; http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10848 $499 for 1TB raid. It has an eSATA which should plug in with an ExpressCard/34 eSATA card in my MacBook Pro. Supposedly around 100MByte/sec sustained speed with the expresscard/34, which should be more than enough for the sheer codec. I'm waiting on the Lacie and expresscard/34, I'll let you know how it goes. |
February 9th, 2007, 12:30 PM | #8 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
|
|
February 9th, 2007, 12:47 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 263
|
Your workflow won't change. You just use the Sheer codec for capture and for your sequence, and output to whatever the project calls for.
- Chuck, just download the demo already ;-) -Tim |
February 9th, 2007, 01:13 PM | #10 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
But when I use the easy setup to create a sheer video sequence and then try to capture FCP doesn't see the camera. I am able to capture from this camera into a project setting with the Apple Intermediate Codec using the log and capture window and I can capture to a native or basic HDV sequence but not using the capture window [a small dialog box pops up which asks for the reel number, then it goes off and captures the entire tape]. When I launch the log and capture window in the sheer video project I get an error message "Capture Perset must have a video and audio digitizer set to capture. Please change to desired preset in the Audio/Video Settings." I assume this is refering to the Capture and Settings Tab in the log and capture window. In there under device control it is set [by default] to Non-controllable device, when I open that pop up menu there's about six choices for device control [O tried them all - non worked] after clicking on the DVCProHD firewire option I get "Unable to initialize video deck. You may still log offline clips or use capture now." Which also doesn't work. The capture/input dialog box appears t be similar to the easy set up bu there is no sheer video setups available. I'm guessing this is a set up issue. Sorry to use this thread for support. I did email Sheer Viedo but they have not responded. I also captured into an SD uncompressed sheer video project and it worked and looked great. My expectation is that you would capture just like you do with the Apple Intermediate codec, using the log and capture window but with the Sheer Video Codec. Eteinne had mentioned that you couldn't capture HDV with the demo copy of the software but I didn't see that mentioned on their website. |
|
February 9th, 2007, 01:42 PM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
-Tim |
|
February 9th, 2007, 01:49 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks
Posts: 1,104
|
Thanks, hopefully I'll hear back from support.
I haven't done too much troubleshooting just because this looks more like a configuration issue than a real problem. |
February 14th, 2007, 01:57 PM | #13 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12
|
I haven't tried any live capturing yet, still waiting on RAID setup.
I'm having problems de-interlacing for output to 1080p though, the best p output I can get without crazy artifacts is 720p. Since almost no one will watch 1080p, I guess its ok to only output to max 720p. |
March 6th, 2007, 07:32 PM | #14 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Andreas Wittenstein BitJazz Inc. http://www.bitjazz.com/ |
|
March 6th, 2007, 07:40 PM | #15 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Andreas Wittenstein BitJazz Inc. http://www.bitjazz.com/ |
|
| ||||||
|
|