|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 29th, 2007, 01:59 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 505
|
Multiclip editing is so slow....
I have four HDV clips (different angles of the same music event) that I'm editing as a multiclip, but the realtime editing playback is very jerky and almost impossible to edit (there's a huge time lag between me clicking on the angle and it changing). Is there some setting I'm missing to speed this process up? I'm using a Mac Pro 2.6GHz with 4GB RAM, and reading the clips off internal 7200 SATA drives. Surely multiclip eding shouldn't be as slow as this? The Mac Activity Monitor shows the CPU's being far from maxed out.
Thanks Greg |
January 29th, 2007, 02:55 AM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
4 angles of HDV work pretty well on my dual 2.0 G5. So yes, something is up on your machine. Any effects on the clips comprising the multiclip?
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
January 29th, 2007, 03:28 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 645
|
i'd agree with Nate, 4 streams of HDV is not much considering the capabilities of your hardware... how many other apps do you have running? is the performance improved by a restart?
|
January 29th, 2007, 10:04 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 505
|
Thanks for the replies and confirmation - I'm not at the machine now, but will try a complete reboot later. Would the multiclip display be affected by the type of codec used in the sequence (i.e. if it was using uncompressed)?
|
January 29th, 2007, 12:03 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mariposa, CA
Posts: 200
|
I would make sure that there are no filters or motion changes made to your clips. Then, check to make sure the sequence setup matches your clips 100%. It sounds like the kind of behavior when your computer is attempting some RT changes while doing multicam.
|
January 29th, 2007, 12:20 PM | #6 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
I'm confused, you said you were using HDV streams in your original post. HDV streams are about 3.5mbytes/sec. An uncompressed stream is about 100mbytes/sec...a HUGE difference. Unless you have at least a 4 drive SATA RAID, you're not going to be able to play back even a single uncompressed stream, much less 4. 4 would be insane. You should do some reading on format data rates and how they effect editing.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
|
January 29th, 2007, 02:17 PM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
Thanks again. |
|
January 29th, 2007, 02:35 PM | #8 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
It's usually about 13megs/sec. But that's enough to cause some problems on some machines.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
|
January 29th, 2007, 04:39 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|