|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 4th, 2007, 02:49 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 6
|
Thoughts on a new system
Hello everyone,
I am looking for some input in regards to a Mac based editing system. I am just getting into doing some video production work for my employer and am looking at setting up a system to run FCP. The videos would mainly be for in-house training and shot primarily in SD (my camera does however have the capability to shot in HD). Now for the options, obviously I would like to get a Mac Pro system but I have a feeling that my boss might not bite on the price tag. So these are what I am looking at. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thought 1: MacBook Pro, 17-inch 2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 3GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM - 1x2GB, 1x1GB 100GB Serial ATA Drive @ 7200 rpm MacBook Pro 17-inch Widescreen Display SuperDrive 8x (DVD+R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) Accessory Kit Backlit Keyboard/Mac OS Thought 2: iMac, 24-inch, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 3GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM - 1x2GB, 1x1GB 250GB Serial ATA Drive NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256MB SDRAM SuperDrive 8X (DVD+R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) Apple Keyboard & Mighty Mouse + Mac OS X (US English) Accessory kit Additionally, I am looking at adding: Apple Cinema Display (20" flat panel) & G-DRIVE 500GB External Hard Drive to which ever system seems to pan out. My rational to this is that these options will afford me more space for the video and a second monitor. I guess one question that is in the back of my mind is how well either of these systems will handle working in HD if I decide to go this route and will they work well with Motion? (I guess that is two questions) Again I would appreciate any light you might be able to shed on this. Thanks! Last edited by Morey Van; January 4th, 2007 at 08:27 PM. |
January 4th, 2007, 06:04 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 796
|
Both of these systems will handle HD exceptionally well. I would opt for the 24" iMac. You can easily edit with one monitor, it has a 7200 RPM drive, plus it's portable. Maybe not as much so as a laptop, but there is a company that makes a travel bag for the iMac that is airline carry-on approved.
__________________
Dave Perry Cinematographer LLC Director of Photography • Editor • Digital Film Production • 540.915.2752 • daveperry.net |
January 5th, 2007, 04:44 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,939
|
i would check but my g5 imac only supports display mirroring on a second monitor, making it quite pointless for you. The macbook pro does support a second monitor (using the 17" as one) or you can use it as the main monitor with the laptop closed. The 24" screen would be good, i would get a matrox mxo box to let you display video real time on any tv or monitor. Making editing so much easier.
|
January 5th, 2007, 04:46 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,939
|
i would check but my g5 imac only supports display mirroring on a second monitor, making it quite pointless for you. The macbook pro does support a second monitor (using the 17" as one) or you can use it as the main monitor with the laptop closed. The 24" screen would be good, i would get a matrox mxo box to let you display video real time on any tv or monitor. Making editing so much easier.
|
January 5th, 2007, 07:13 AM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 6
|
Dave and Phil,
Thanks for the input. As for the monitor issue, I did not even think about the iMac not supporting dual monitors. This is what the Apple site says: "Mini-DVI video out with support for DVI, VGA, S-video, and composite video output (requires adapter, sold separately) Support for external display with digital resolution up to 1920 x 1200, analog resolution up to 2048 x 1536" I guess it can be done with the adapter? |
January 6th, 2007, 03:09 AM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,939
|
i think it still means display mirroring. I would check! My imac needs an adaptor to use a second display, but it is only mirroring
|
January 6th, 2007, 06:28 AM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 796
|
Quote:
The Intel iMacs DO support dual displays. Scroll to the bottom. For that matter, even the MacBooks support extended desktop. Apple has listened to its customers. Phil, here's how you can get your G5 iMac to support extended desktop. I used it for the 2 years I owned a G3 iBook and it works great.
__________________
Dave Perry Cinematographer LLC Director of Photography • Editor • Digital Film Production • 540.915.2752 • daveperry.net Last edited by Dave Perry; January 6th, 2007 at 07:09 AM. |
|
January 6th, 2007, 07:28 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 590
|
The Cost of the two systems you built are comporable to a Mac Pro. You might as well just go with it then.
I would take the Macbook Pro above the Imac for portable reasons. |
January 6th, 2007, 08:39 AM | #9 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 6
|
Dave and Phil,
I did look after Phil's post and also found out that the Mac's do have extended desktop built in but disabled. Thanks for the info. Steve, You do make a valid point and I actually was thinking about this. I decided on one of the other two systems only because with either one of them I can add the second monitor, the additional drive space, goto 3MB RAM and still save money over the MacPro. Heck the cost to upgrade to 4GB RAM is over $1000 alone right now. Thanks agian for the input. |
January 6th, 2007, 08:52 AM | #10 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 6
|
Also let me ask this, I am not overly concerned about the portability factor, granted it is a nice feature but would the larger screen size of the iMac be more of a plus over portability?
|
January 6th, 2007, 02:58 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 796
|
The larger screen size is a big plus. It's HD ready at 1920x1200. Also, the Intel iMac extended desktop is NOT disabled. It's good to go right out of the box when you use the mini DVI adapter. Same with the MacBooks.
__________________
Dave Perry Cinematographer LLC Director of Photography • Editor • Digital Film Production • 540.915.2752 • daveperry.net |
January 6th, 2007, 06:26 PM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
|
|
January 6th, 2007, 06:51 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
You might also want to consider the Dell 24" LCD over the 20" cinema display - they're currently about the same price, but with the Dell you get enough resolution for 1:1 display of 1080 material plus a variety of input options - dvi, vga, component, s-video and composite.
|
January 8th, 2007, 10:18 AM | #14 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 6
|
Thanks for all the input. I think I am going to go with the iMac set-up.
|
January 8th, 2007, 10:28 AM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Odessa, TX
Posts: 93
|
why not wait until the end of the week? Apple has a habit of announcing new computers at macworld, adding shipping today right after the announcement. The keynote is scheduled to happen tomorrow.
|
| ||||||
|
|