|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 16th, 2006, 09:04 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 116
|
MacBook vs. Macbook Pro
As far as I can tell, the Macbook differs from the MacBook Pro in the following ways:
1. Video Card: MB has no Video Card. The Pro has either a 128 or 256 Card. 2. Size: MB is 13". The Pro is 15.4" 3. Card Slot Connector: MB doesn't have it, the Pro does. Here are my questions: 1. What differences will I see between the MB and the Pro if I'm editing HDV on FC Studio? 2. Will the lack of Video Memory seriously affect realtime HDV playback? Last edited by Dave Halliday; May 16th, 2006 at 12:28 PM. |
May 17th, 2006, 06:39 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 116
|
I guess we won't know this answer until people start receiving the Macbooks...
|
May 17th, 2006, 07:06 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Basel area, Switzerland
Posts: 285
|
The MB is essentially equivalent to the CoreDuo Mac mini. So if anyone has info regarding FCP on the mini, we'll know what the MB will be like. I'm curious to find out myself...
HTH, Ron |
May 18th, 2006, 12:59 PM | #4 | |
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
I was still curious how the MacBook compared to both the PowerBook G4 and MacBook Pro, so for fun I ran XBench on a sleek black MacBook (2 GHz Intel Duo, 512 MB RAM) in the store to see how it compares to the PowerBook G4 (1.67 GHz, 1.5 GB RAM) and MacBook Pro (2 GHz Intel Duo, 2 GB RAM). Your numbers will vary, this is like measuring EPA gas mileage figures. The MacBook and MacBook Pro are likely to be reasonable performers compared to the G4 PowerBooks they replace, but it's not going to be a night and day difference. The only reasonable conclusion one can make from this not very scientific test is that the difference beetween the MacBook and MacBook Pro is that overall system performance is not by any means the big difference, the biggest diffrences are in terms of features, not performance. The Intel laptops have a faster memory bus compared to the G4, that's for sure, and the only numbers besides the Open GL numbers that stand out as a huge difference between G4 and the Intel Duo notebooks. Slight differences in numbers are not statistically significant. XBench uses a 2.0 GHz G5 running Tiger as the 100 point baseline for comparisons. Test: PowerBook G4 vs. MacBook vs. MacBook Pro ----------------------------------------------- CPU: 66 vs. 73 vs. 69 Memory: 27 vs. 112 vs. 109 Quartz Graphics: 62 vs. 53 vs. 56 OpenGL Graphics: 81 vs. 215 vs. 139 User Interface: 36 vs. 15 vs. 21 Disk Combined: 33 vs. 24 vs. 28 Sequential Disk: 45 vs. 28 vs. 36 Random Disk: 25 vs. 20 vs. 24
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
May 19th, 2006, 07:49 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 116
|
Test: PowerBook G4 vs. MacBook vs. MacBook Pro
----------------------------------------------- CPU: 66 vs. 73 vs. 69 Memory: 27 vs. 112 vs. 109 Quartz Graphics: 62 vs. 53 vs. 56 OpenGL Graphics: 81 vs. 215 vs. 139 User Interface: 36 vs. 15 vs. 21 Disk Combined: 33 vs. 24 vs. 28 Sequential Disk: 45 vs. 28 vs. 36 Random Disk: 25 vs. 20 vs. 24 ================== These numbers *can't* be right. The Macbook with 512 MB memory can't possibly outperform the MacBook Pro with 2GB memory on the "Memory" test. I see your caveat about gas mileage numbers but still.... Thats WAAAAAY off. Something's up here. |
May 19th, 2006, 12:07 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Basel area, Switzerland
Posts: 285
|
Xbench doesn't have the best reputation as a benchmark-suite. Google, and you'll find lots of evidence on that. Convenience doesn't make for quality, unfortunately...
|
May 19th, 2006, 12:58 PM | #7 | |
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
May 19th, 2006, 01:02 PM | #8 | |
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
Quote:
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
| ||||||
|
|