|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should we host FCP X in its own dedicated forum? | |||
| Yes, give it a new home of its own. |
   
|
35 | 92.11% |
| No, lump it in with previous FCP versions. |
  
|
3 | 7.89% |
| Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 22nd, 2011, 02:28 PM
|
#1 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Separate board for FCP X
Hey folks, I've received an email that makes a good argument for hosting FCP X discussions separately from Final Cut Suite 3 and other earlier versions. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 02:37 PM
|
#2 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
A very good idea!
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 02:57 PM
|
#3 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
Agreed. Makes sense.
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 02:59 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 789
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
Yes. FCP X will have different issues from FCP 7 since it is so ....well different.
__________________
David Parks: DP/Editor: Jacobs Aerospace at NASA Johnson Space Center https://www.youtube.com/user/JacobsESCG |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 04:02 PM
|
#5 |
|
Kino-Eye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 457
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
A most excellent idea!
__________________
David Tames { blog: http://Kino-Eye.com twitter: @cinemakinoeye } |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 04:06 PM
|
#6 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
I think a sub-forum of this one will be best. If you make a new top-level forum we will just constantly be moving FCP X posts from here into it because no one will realize it is there. We all have this one bookmarked.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 04:55 PM
|
#7 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 826
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
Great idea. The early responses from the main FCP X release thread seem to indicate two main categories of "pro": those who work in a closed shop (or one-man-band) and those who work in a "pipeline". There seems a tremendous upside for the closed shop (though not without bugs), whereas the pipeline guys are generally disappointed (some bitterly) and likely to stick with FCP 7 until major pipeline features are added to FCP X.
As a member of the former, I decided to bite the bullet last night and downloaded FCP X, Compressor 4.0 plus a full set of FCP X tutorials. So I would appreciate a dedicated forum for FCP X where we can leave the petulance behind and settle down to sorting out the early bugs and workarounds - such as the apparently fragile media handling and connections. This is where DV Info really shines and we are really going to need this forum during this difficult birth of a new editing paradigm. (Well, it's a new paradigm to me, anyway!) |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 05:46 PM
|
#8 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Lebanon, New York
Posts: 240
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
It's a wonderful idea . . .
__________________
iMac Pro (3.2 GHz 8-Core Intel Xeon W ): OS X 10.15.6; 64 GBs RAM; Radeon Pro Vega 64X 16 GB graphics; 2 TB internal SSD; 3 external SSDs; MOTU 828ES |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 07:53 PM
|
#9 |
|
Sponsor: Westside AV
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mount Washington Valley, NH, USA
Posts: 1,365
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
I vote for a separate forum. They really are 2 completely different animals.
I will only be using FCPX (FizPix) for learning in the near future. At least until AJA and Matrox have real video monitoring solutions working. And maybe on new WEB only projects. But I use M100 and FCP every day. Maybe one day I will switch, we will see. So I really view them as two separate entities, like M100, Adobe CS or FCP are all different.
__________________
Olof Ekbergh • olof@WestsideAV.com Westside A V Studios • http://www.WestsideAVstore.com/ |
|
|
|
|
June 22nd, 2011, 11:42 PM
|
#10 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 47
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
Great idea. You can call it iMovie Pro
|
|
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2011, 06:45 AM
|
#11 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
It's NOT the same program therefore a separate board is needed. Very, very promising program but I will not be doing any pro work with it for a few weeks until I get the hang of the transitions. The titler is a major improvement.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
|
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2011, 10:25 AM
|
#12 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 451
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
Two forums will greatly reduce confusion since very few questions will apply to both apps.
|
|
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2011, 11:30 AM
|
#13 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York NY
Posts: 322
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2011, 12:25 PM
|
#14 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
The primary daily function of the Wranglers is to move posts into the correct forums, so this won't be a problem.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
|
|
|
|
June 23rd, 2011, 04:01 PM
|
#15 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 451
|
re: Separate board for FCP X
Yes Arnie, you're right about that!!
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
