|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 23rd, 2010, 11:19 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 173
|
DVD Discs Capacity
All of the DVDs I've made so far, have mainly been less than an hour. I'm doing a project now that will turn out to be about 1 hours 40 minutes in length.
When using Premiere Elements on my PC the final quality of the end-product was directly proportional to the length of the video, so in one case while burning a video, the Premiere program indicated that the entire video could be burned but at a drop from High to Medium quality. Hence, 2 discs were used. Now I'm using Final Cut Express 4 on the Mac and would like to place all of the 1 hour and 30 minutes on one disc at the highest quality possible. After digging up on this site and on Google, the answers seem to point to bit rates and compression and not the actual discs. So is compressor software (e.g. Sorenson) essential in a case like this, or will Final Cut Express 4 along with iDVD be quite suitable for doing the job? |
October 23rd, 2010, 11:28 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 173
|
Looks like I'm answering my own post! hah hah.... The disc will hold up to 120 minutes of high quality anyway. However, if anyone still has anything extra to add, or useful suggestions, they'd be greatly appreciated!
:-D |
October 23rd, 2010, 11:38 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 978
|
Hello,
You are correct that in the end it is all about the bitrate. I can store 8 hours of video but it may not look so great. What you will need to do is figure out the math to get the highest bitrate that leaves just short of the 4.3GB footprint of DVD-Rs Also keep in mind that the audio has to go on there too. Make sure that it is in compressed format and not a WAV which will eat up lots of space. With an hour 30 of content you should be able to do the Audio @ 128KBit which should sound great for talking etc. and leave about 5500-6000kbit for the video. If you do 2 pass encoding VBR this should look fantastic. -Josh C.
__________________
Simple Thought Productions - Life @ 30,000 Words per second |
October 23rd, 2010, 02:45 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
What about dual layer discs? They can hold over 8gb of content.
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
October 23rd, 2010, 02:48 PM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
Have you had much luck with them? I tried some when they first came out but only 2 out of the 3 I sent out only 2 said they worked. The third's DVD player had issues with the video on the 2nd layer. Mind you this was when they were first out some time ago so I havent experimented with them since. I usually do sporting events so I can get 2 and a half hours of good content on my disks without issue. I use FFMPEG to compress my HDV down to a video and audio stream to burn with Adobe Encore for burning.
__________________
Simple Thought Productions - Life @ 30,000 Words per second Last edited by Josh Chesarek; October 23rd, 2010 at 03:04 PM. Reason: forgot the quote |
|
October 23rd, 2010, 03:02 PM | #6 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: York, England
Posts: 1,323
|
Quote:
I NEVER ship a dual layer disc because so many players won't play them reliably - I really wish they would because it would solve a lot of problems.
__________________
Qualified UAV Pilot with CAA PFAW Aerial Photo / Aerial Video | Corporate Video Production |
|
October 23rd, 2010, 06:11 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 173
|
Thanks for all your comments. I'll look for the right settings (bit rates) before burning.
I've never worked with dual layer discs. Is the burning process the same? I'd like to hear some more about it. |
October 23rd, 2010, 06:15 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Winter Park, FL
Posts: 978
|
Quote:
-Josh C.
__________________
Simple Thought Productions - Life @ 30,000 Words per second |
|
October 25th, 2010, 12:04 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 173
|
I'm going to go with the usual disc holding 1 hour 20 minutes maximum video and use the bit rates you suggested. Thanks again, much appreciated.
|
October 26th, 2010, 11:41 AM | #10 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Healdsburg, California
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
Since it sounds to me like you are using iDVD, here are a few things to be aware of: iDVD uses its own built-in compression process, so using a dedicated compression application such as Compressor or Sorenson to create the mpeg-2 file prior to moving it to iDVD is not necessary, and likely won't work anyway. iDVD applies its own bit-rate designation to the footage. At its quickest setting "Best Performance", iDVD applies a broad-base bitrate within a set range to the entire video, and this setting allows for a maximum of approximately 90 minutes of footage. At the higher settings 'High Quality" and "Professional Quality", iDVD analyzes the contents first, and determines the appropriate bit rate to apply scene by scene. (The difference between these two is that "Professional Quality" works more effectively for better audio.) This process takes a while because it is a two-step process for scanning and then compressing. This process allows for a maximum 120 minutes (2 hours) of content, but you must also be wary of timing factors applied for your menus. (In rare instances, iDVD may errantly create menu interfaces in repeating 15 minute loops, eating up a lot of your available space.) With moving menus, and such, I think it is safe to say you should be able to get an estimation of 1 hour and 57 minutes of your feature content onto the DVD - give or take. Hope this helps. -Jon
__________________
"Are we to go on record, sir, with our assertion that the 'pink hearts, yellow moons, orange stars, and green clovers' are, in point of fact', magically delicious?" - Walter Hollarhan before the House Subcommittee on Integrity in Advertising - May, 1974 |
|
October 27th, 2010, 09:56 AM | #11 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
Quote:
Still, I noticed a drop in quality from the original video to the DVD video. It seems that Sorenson is the answer to that. So since you're saying that using compressor software would be essentially useless when using iDVD, what would I burn the final DVD with, if I went ahead and used Sorenson? There's no option in Final Cut Express 4 to burn (which is surprising, because Adobe Premiere Elements can encode and burn from within the program). Sounds like I have to fork out more money to buy another program. Say it ain't so ...? |
||
October 27th, 2010, 12:03 PM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
It ain't so.
Of course there is a drop in quality from the original footage to the DVD. That's how it works with MPEG2 at DVD bit rates. iDVD can make high quality DVDs but is limited in other ways. If you are thinking of spending $800 for Sorenson Squeeze (a great but limited program which will make a file that iDVD probably will not recognize), why not just get Final Cut Studio and get everything you need, including burning DVDs from within Final Cut, for $1000?
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
October 27th, 2010, 12:32 PM | #13 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
However, it looks like I can't improve on the quality using Sorenson if it's going to be burned in iDVD. I didn't realise beforehand that Express 4 does not directly encode and burn DVDs. Last edited by Helen Habib; October 27th, 2010 at 12:37 PM. Reason: Edit. |
|
October 29th, 2010, 03:09 PM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
A new copy of Sorenson 5 for $158 isn't a bad deal and an upgrade to 6.5 is $300 so it's a real deal if that's a program you need.
The trick with judging DVDs is to watch it on a real TV, not the computer monitor. Computer monitors will always give you a harsh view of the DVD, especially if you have the original footage to compare it with. DVDs are standard definition and most computer DVD programs zoom into the image to fill the computer screen (which is higher resolution), taking a low resolution image and making it worse.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
November 1st, 2010, 10:46 AM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Trinidad
Posts: 173
|
Hmm...I thought that Sorenson was a must, but it doesn't appear so.
I see what you mean about the TV being a better quality medium to look at the DVD. It really does look better than on the PC monitor. So it looks like iDVD will take care of the best quality possible before burning. Thanks again for all the replies. |
| ||||||
|
|