Need to convert HDV PAL to NTSC DVD but getting jerky results at DVinfo.net

Shaun R Walker · March 10th, 2010, 05:52 AM

I have done a search through the archives here and couldn't find a definitive answer to converting my HDV PAL project to an NTSC DVD for commercial release. I tried Compressor, but the image is jerky and the graphics look awful. Do I need to invest in Natress, do I conform in Cinema tools, or is it simply a case of changing my project to Pro-res and doing it within FCP? Your help would be much appreciated.

Robert Lane · March 10th, 2010, 08:06 AM

Absolutely not, Compressor can do the job perfectly well, you need to turn on advanced settings that will clear up the problem. However, be prepared for extremely long encode times, as you ramp up quality settings in Compressor the time to complete goes exponentially higher.

Specifically you need to turn ON Frame Controls and use the settings shown in the pic enclosed. Because HDV can fall apart easily during down-conversion try doing some 10-second test encodes of a section that has a lot of motion or motion-graphics. If these settings still aren't giving you good results you may need to bump up the quality of RESIZE, DEINTERLACE AND RATE CONVERSION to "Best".

There could be other reasons your footage is jerky, such as panning too fast for the frame-rate shot in-camera; using deinterlace filters in FCP rather than letting Compressor handle it and a few others.

Try these settings first and let us know what happens.

Craig Parkes · March 10th, 2010, 08:58 PM

Be prepared for very long encode times, compressor's best settings may be satisfactory but are slow compared to other options.

Robert Lane · March 10th, 2010, 09:21 PM

Yep, Craig is right as I pointed out in this head-to-head test of Mac-encoders:

encoder shootout

In fact if all the quality settings in Compressor had been set to their maximum that 10-second test file would have been about 1.5x to 2x longer than that to encode!

Compressor is dog slow at doing it's work, but *it can* do it, just be patient. MPEGStreamclip can make encodes also and is faster at it when using average quality settings but when Compressor's settings are at the max MPSC can't compete.

March 10th, 2010, 05:52 AM	#1
Shaun R Walker Regular Crew Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Central Coast, NSW Australia Posts: 119	Need to convert HDV PAL to NTSC DVD but getting jerky results I have done a search through the archives here and couldn't find a definitive answer to converting my HDV PAL project to an NTSC DVD for commercial release. I tried Compressor, but the image is jerky and the graphics look awful. Do I need to invest in Natress, do I conform in Cinema tools, or is it simply a case of changing my project to Pro-res and doing it within FCP? Your help would be much appreciated.

March 10th, 2010, 08:06 AM	#2
Robert Lane Go Go Godzilla Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Scottsdale, AZ USA Posts: 2,823 Images: 15	Absolutely not, Compressor can do the job perfectly well, you need to turn on advanced settings that will clear up the problem. However, be prepared for extremely long encode times, as you ramp up quality settings in Compressor the time to complete goes exponentially higher. Specifically you need to turn ON Frame Controls and use the settings shown in the pic enclosed. Because HDV can fall apart easily during down-conversion try doing some 10-second test encodes of a section that has a lot of motion or motion-graphics. If these settings still aren't giving you good results you may need to bump up the quality of RESIZE, DEINTERLACE AND RATE CONVERSION to "Best". There could be other reasons your footage is jerky, such as panning too fast for the frame-rate shot in-camera; using deinterlace filters in FCP rather than letting Compressor handle it and a few others. Try these settings first and let us know what happens. Attached Thumbnails

March 10th, 2010, 08:58 PM	#3
Craig Parkes Major Player Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand Posts: 444	Be prepared for very long encode times, compressor's best settings may be satisfactory but are slow compared to other options. __________________ www.afterglow.co.nz

March 10th, 2010, 09:21 PM	#4
Robert Lane Go Go Godzilla Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Scottsdale, AZ USA Posts: 2,823 Images: 15	Yep, Craig is right as I pointed out in this head-to-head test of Mac-encoders: encoder shootout In fact if all the quality settings in Compressor had been set to their maximum that 10-second test file would have been about 1.5x to 2x longer than that to encode! Compressor is dog slow at doing it's work, but it can do it, just be patient. MPEGStreamclip can make encodes also and is faster at it when using average quality settings but when Compressor's settings are at the max MPSC can't compete.