|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 26th, 2009, 02:20 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 221
|
Prores 422 Proxy workflow.
I might be mistaken (very Likely), but I have not seen any one mention a ProRes 422 (proxy) based workflow.
Seems that you have to manually swop the ProRes proxy files for full quality ProRes 422 files in order to do a proper Offline workflow. My workflow is Copy AVCHD file structures to a directory on a disk. start a new project in FCP 7. Log and transfer to ProRes 422 (proxy) from AVCHD files using a capture directory for these files start a new FCP project. Log and transfer to ProRes 422 from AVCHD files using another capture directory delete both project and create the real project I will now Edit with ProRes proxy Swap proxy files with the ProRes 422 files and render project. Is this really the most simpel way top utilize the proxy files in FCP 7? Last time I used proxy files was with Vegas 7. Here a VASST plugin made it very simple. So I am convinced that I have missed something in FCP7. Thanks
__________________
---------------------------- 12c41 JOS. Svendsen |
September 26th, 2009, 03:02 PM | #2 |
Better than Halle Berry
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 435
|
You could but why bother? Get more hard drive space and stick with regular ProRes or ProRes HQ- then you don't have to tack on a bunch of extra time re-encoding everything and media managing to switch from Proxy back to ProRes.
Noah |
September 26th, 2009, 03:15 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 221
|
Well I could, but I am offlining on a Macbook pro, and my tests show that ProRes 422 (proxy) is faster than regular Prores 422 on a Macbook Pro and a third of the size.
But you are right if there isn't a smart way to edit proxies in FCP 7. The best
__________________
---------------------------- 12c41 JOS. Svendsen Last edited by Jos Svendsen; September 26th, 2009 at 03:16 PM. Reason: forgot something |
September 26th, 2009, 03:18 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 628
|
Yes. This is the workflow that I am currently using on a project.
To the question of "Why would you do this?" - it's obvious. ProRes (proxy) is an amazingly efficient codec that has meager processing and file size requirements. My offline workflow is based on this codec for the purpose of editing a high quality source anywhere, without the use of ANY external storage whatsoever. Try doing that with ProRes 422 (HQ). Proxy has allowed me to leave my bay and edit in the world. -C PS- It is really easy to replace these files for online. Either rename your media or reconnect without matching the file name. 5 minute process. |
September 26th, 2009, 03:24 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Moab, UT
Posts: 264
|
You can use Media Manager to compress the files to proxy and when you're through the edit, reconnect to your orig. Search for "Transcoding for Editing on the Road" in one of the Supermags over on lafcpug.
|
November 15th, 2009, 02:34 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Soest ,Holland
Posts: 307
|
offline editing with proxy files
Hello,
I shot a docu in Venezuela with an HD XDCAM 422, on the disk there is also the proxy files, can I edit with this material and then online it to XDCAM 422? What sort of problem am i going to run in to ? My main concern is that the quality of sound and picture can make me do things and cuts with the material I would not do if I had a better quality to work with. I am editing with AVID but I dont think the NLE should matter, Any ideas? |
December 28th, 2009, 03:43 PM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 6
|
Not getting ProRes 422
Hi Noah,
Im doing a Log and Transfer with my HDV 1080p30 footage from my CF Card using the Sony Z7u. I look at the preferences for Log and transfer window and see the 422 for Sony HDD preset but, after ingesting a clip and I look at the info of the clip, it says HDV 1080p30 vs saying ProRes 422. What am I not selecting correctly? |
May 27th, 2011, 06:02 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Morgan, Vermont
Posts: 130
|
Re: Prores 422 Proxy workflow Magic Bullet Grinder and Technicolor Preset
I have been shooting with the new Technicolor preset for the Canon DSLRs. In order to recover the flat colors, it is suggested that you use the Technicolor LUT in post. I have been doing this with LUT Baby, a free plugin filter from Red Giant for Final Cut. The results are incredible! However the amount of time needed to render is awful...several days for a one hour set of clips! So with the new Magic Bullet Grinder, I have imported my Cinestyle clips into Pro Res LT and set Grinder to produce proxies first and the full main file second. It does the proxies real fast. So here is my work flow, and I don't think it is quite right..
All clips shot with the Technicolor Cinestyle Preset Camera One I import footage from 7D, telling grinder to make proxy first, then main Import using Pro Res LT Bring proxy clips onto time line, all butted together Color correct with Lut Baby and Technicoor mga Render Export as Quick Time movie -- is the QT movie here the full res from the main files? Does it connect with the full res main versions automatically to produce a full resolution Pro Res video? All clips are in the same folder. Camera Two Repeat process Then in new sequence import the two QT files, combine them with separate audio tracks and run Plural Eyes to synch up the two QT movie and the audio tracks. Then edit the sequence to taste. |
May 27th, 2011, 11:28 AM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 700
|
Re: Not getting ProRes 422
Quote:
Bypassed it by transcoding through ClipWrap instead. |
|
May 27th, 2011, 12:22 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Huddersfield, UK
Posts: 469
|
Re: Prores 422 Proxy workflow.
I'm very interested in this idea of a Prores 422 proxy workflow but frankly have never come across it before so can't really follow this thread. Can anyone point me in the right direction for a tutorial on it? I only have FCP6 mind you.
Also I've read here before that Prores 422 HQ is not worth it compared to non HQ - any thoughts (sorry if that hi-jacks the thread)? thanks, Geoff |
May 28th, 2011, 11:28 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 700
|
Re: Prores 422 Proxy workflow.
ProRes Proxy is a compact, I-frame intermediate codec.
Here's the short of how I've used it with just FCP: 1. L&T all footage as ProRes Proxy. Even on the main laptop hard drive. 2. Sit on the porch, at the coffee shop, by the lake, during a long car drive, wherever, and edit that Proxy footage. 3. Once finished with the proxy cut and ready to render, toss out all the L&T'd footage via finder. Leave the project file untouched. 4. Plug in your external drive/RAID/whatever, batch import all footage again, this time at a higher quality setting (PR422, HQ, whatever). FCP doesn't care, everything will link up as though nothing had changed. 5. Render, export, and enjoy The value of this isn't as apparent for short studio edits... but long, drawn-out projects where you occasionally edit here and there, for on-the-go edits while travelling, or for little personal fun projects where you'd rather not be tied to your RAID, it's a treat. |
June 8th, 2011, 12:56 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Re: Prores 422 Proxy workflow.
Hi Kevin,
I will probably do exactly as you say with a project of 4TB of H264 footage that I have to edit on my MacBook Pro whilst travelling. My main question is in regards to Sequence settings. I work in Premiere but the same may be true of both programs... When you are working on the proxy files, do you create a sequence to match those files or to match the high quality files? In Final Cut I think you can change the sequence settings later but in Premiere I think you're stuck with the settings you pick at the beginning. As far as I know, the sequence settings would really only effect your rendered video previews right? And you'll only have to render if you create s equence with a different codec type to your footage? Am I on the right track? Thanks! -- John |
| ||||||
|
|