Compressing 2-hour long movie to DVD- best path at DVinfo.net

Mike Petrucco · September 8th, 2009, 03:43 PM

I have a 1:54 long movie shot in 1080p30, and it is ready for deliery. My 720p output for viewing on a WDTV looks great. My SD DVD however, is not. I used Compressor's preset for 120-minute DVD, but put the resizing filter to maximum quality (statistical prediction) and left it as progressive. I viewed on two different DVD players (both ~5-year old with output on composite to larger widescreen LCDs), and it looks only so so. I am wondering:

For a 120 minute movie, should I do it on a DL DVD and not compress it as much? Is that what is normally done for something this long?

Shaun Roemich · September 8th, 2009, 03:48 PM

Are you using PCM audio? On a 2 hour disc, that will leave precious little for video. Chances are your video data rate is something ridiculously low like 2 mbits/second. Try re-encoding the asset using AC3 Dolby Digital.

Mike Petrucco · September 8th, 2009, 04:22 PM

I am using the default AC3 audio compressor preset which uses 156 MB of the 4.7 GB.

Shaun Roemich · September 8th, 2009, 04:32 PM

Thanks for responding. I'm now fresh out of ideas.

Mike Petrucco · September 8th, 2009, 06:13 PM

Thanks. I'm not so much having a glitch or rogue setting issue. It's more of a question of what is standard or normal practice for putting two hours on DVD. Is it typical to do a double layer disk or use a single layer at the lower bitrate (which is approximately average 5.0 Mbps)?

Shaun Roemich · September 8th, 2009, 06:14 PM

Well, the problem with burned DL DVDs is they are more prone to playback issues on consumer DVD players than single layers (which are STILL not quite 100%...)

Shaun Roemich · September 8th, 2009, 06:16 PM

And I assume you're using VBR during compression and not CBR...

Mike Petrucco · September 8th, 2009, 07:14 PM

Yes, I am using 2-pass VBR.

Robert Lane · September 8th, 2009, 07:40 PM

Mike,

None of the standard MPEG-2 presets in Compressor will yield the best results; I don't know the name of the thread just offhand but if you do a search for my recent posts you'll find one where I've posted screenshots of exactly the settings you need for best possible output from Compressor. Those settings may or may not allow your program to fit on a DVD-5 (single layer) but if not then use DL.

Mike Petrucco · September 8th, 2009, 08:47 PM

I remember that post, but am unable to find it so far. I will keep looking. I do think that I have a decent handle on the settings, and my output is not horrible. I think I need to get some second opinions on it, as I am so used to seeing HD now, that I think I may not be looking at it objectively. I will run a test of a short duration and do the current settings I am using vs. a higher bitrate and see I have all that much difference.

Vito DeFilippo · September 8th, 2009, 09:00 PM

I find in my experience that videos approaching two hours long quickly start to suffer quality issues from the forced lower bitrate. The difference is quite dramatic even between 1:45 and 1:55. Whenever I have one longer than, say 1:40, I always wonder if it's going to look like crap.

Check out this bitrate calculator:

Bitrate Calculator

A quick check shows that a 90 minute video with audio at 224 allows a pretty respectable video bitrate of about 6550. At 105 minute video drops this to 5580. A two hour video drops to 4850.

That being said, I usually work on PC with ProCoder, so I don't know if Compressor is better at lower bitrates or not.

Robert Lane · September 8th, 2009, 09:57 PM

Mike,

I don't think this is the post I was originally thinking of but it's the same information recycled:

http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/non-line...artifacts.html

William Hohauser · September 8th, 2009, 10:43 PM

Try compressing a small section (perhaps a part that really doesn't look good) to NTSC DV anamorphic. Play that section back on a NTSC monitor straight from the computer and compare it to the same section on the DVD. If it's 90% the same then you probably are not going to get much better. If the NTSC DV section looks significantly better then recompress that section to DVD using the same settings you used for the HD sequence. Burn it to DVD and see if it's any better. I have had better luck with some HD formats by making a NTSC DV version first. HDV was that way for me. ProRes HD has worked well directly to DVD but 2 pass is needed for projects with lots of visual detail.

Mike Petrucco · September 8th, 2009, 10:54 PM

Robert- thanks. I had just found it myself and all checks out. I had learned from that post and had also picked up the Compressor 3 Guide by Brian Gary based on your recommendation a while back. I think this is most likely boiling down to bit rate, but am not sure yet.

William- I can try that out as well and see what I get.

Robert Lane · September 9th, 2009, 08:44 PM

Mike,

Post a screen-shot - if possible - of the same scene in the FCP timeline (at 100% viewer size) and the same in DVD playback either on DVDSP or the Apple DVD player and let's see if in fact you've got unwarranted degradation.

September 8th, 2009, 03:43 PM	#1
Mike Petrucco Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 98	Compressing 2-hour long movie to DVD- best path I have a 1:54 long movie shot in 1080p30, and it is ready for deliery. My 720p output for viewing on a WDTV looks great. My SD DVD however, is not. I used Compressor's preset for 120-minute DVD, but put the resizing filter to maximum quality (statistical prediction) and left it as progressive. I viewed on two different DVD players (both ~5-year old with output on composite to larger widescreen LCDs), and it looks only so so. I am wondering: For a 120 minute movie, should I do it on a DL DVD and not compress it as much? Is that what is normally done for something this long?

September 8th, 2009, 03:48 PM	#2
Shaun Roemich Inner Circle Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada Posts: 4,088	Are you using PCM audio? On a 2 hour disc, that will leave precious little for video. Chances are your video data rate is something ridiculously low like 2 mbits/second. Try re-encoding the asset using AC3 Dolby Digital. __________________ Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/

September 8th, 2009, 04:32 PM	#4
Shaun Roemich Inner Circle Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada Posts: 4,088	Thanks for responding. I'm now fresh out of ideas. __________________ Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/

September 8th, 2009, 06:14 PM	#6
Shaun Roemich Inner Circle Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada Posts: 4,088	Well, the problem with burned DL DVDs is they are more prone to playback issues on consumer DVD players than single layers (which are STILL not quite 100%...) __________________ Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/

September 8th, 2009, 06:16 PM	#7
Shaun Roemich Inner Circle Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada Posts: 4,088	And I assume you're using VBR during compression and not CBR... __________________ Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/

September 8th, 2009, 04:22 PM	#3
Mike Petrucco Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 98	I am using the default AC3 audio compressor preset which uses 156 MB of the 4.7 GB.

September 8th, 2009, 06:13 PM	#5
Mike Petrucco Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 98	Thanks. I'm not so much having a glitch or rogue setting issue. It's more of a question of what is standard or normal practice for putting two hours on DVD. Is it typical to do a double layer disk or use a single layer at the lower bitrate (which is approximately average 5.0 Mbps)?

September 8th, 2009, 07:14 PM	#8
Mike Petrucco Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 98	Yes, I am using 2-pass VBR.

September 8th, 2009, 07:40 PM	#9
Robert Lane Go Go Godzilla Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Scottsdale, AZ USA Posts: 2,825 Images: 15	Mike, None of the standard MPEG-2 presets in Compressor will yield the best results; I don't know the name of the thread just offhand but if you do a search for my recent posts you'll find one where I've posted screenshots of exactly the settings you need for best possible output from Compressor. Those settings may or may not allow your program to fit on a DVD-5 (single layer) but if not then use DL.

September 8th, 2009, 08:47 PM	#10
Mike Petrucco Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 98	I remember that post, but am unable to find it so far. I will keep looking. I do think that I have a decent handle on the settings, and my output is not horrible. I think I need to get some second opinions on it, as I am so used to seeing HD now, that I think I may not be looking at it objectively. I will run a test of a short duration and do the current settings I am using vs. a higher bitrate and see I have all that much difference.

September 8th, 2009, 09:00 PM	#11
Vito DeFilippo Trustee Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 1,585	I find in my experience that videos approaching two hours long quickly start to suffer quality issues from the forced lower bitrate. The difference is quite dramatic even between 1:45 and 1:55. Whenever I have one longer than, say 1:40, I always wonder if it's going to look like crap. Check out this bitrate calculator: Bitrate Calculator A quick check shows that a 90 minute video with audio at 224 allows a pretty respectable video bitrate of about 6550. At 105 minute video drops this to 5580. A two hour video drops to 4850. That being said, I usually work on PC with ProCoder, so I don't know if Compressor is better at lower bitrates or not. __________________ . http://www.nosmallroles.com

September 8th, 2009, 09:57 PM	#12
Robert Lane Go Go Godzilla Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Scottsdale, AZ USA Posts: 2,825 Images: 15	Mike, I don't think this is the post I was originally thinking of but it's the same information recycled: http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/non-line...artifacts.html

September 8th, 2009, 10:43 PM	#13
William Hohauser Inner Circle Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: New York City Posts: 2,650	Try compressing a small section (perhaps a part that really doesn't look good) to NTSC DV anamorphic. Play that section back on a NTSC monitor straight from the computer and compare it to the same section on the DVD. If it's 90% the same then you probably are not going to get much better. If the NTSC DV section looks significantly better then recompress that section to DVD using the same settings you used for the HD sequence. Burn it to DVD and see if it's any better. I have had better luck with some HD formats by making a NTSC DV version first. HDV was that way for me. ProRes HD has worked well directly to DVD but 2 pass is needed for projects with lots of visual detail. __________________ William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation

September 8th, 2009, 10:54 PM	#14
Mike Petrucco Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 98	Robert- thanks. I had just found it myself and all checks out. I had learned from that post and had also picked up the Compressor 3 Guide by Brian Gary based on your recommendation a while back. I think this is most likely boiling down to bit rate, but am not sure yet. William- I can try that out as well and see what I get.

September 9th, 2009, 08:44 PM	#15
Robert Lane Go Go Godzilla Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Scottsdale, AZ USA Posts: 2,825 Images: 15	Mike, Post a screen-shot - if possible - of the same scene in the FCP timeline (at 100% viewer size) and the same in DVD playback either on DVDSP or the Apple DVD player and let's see if in fact you've got unwarranted degradation.