|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 10th, 2009, 06:19 AM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
It would be pretty simple to test bitrate difference as well. You could encode a short section at a higher bitrate and see if it looks better.
|
September 10th, 2009, 08:46 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 410
|
Just a thought, but when you drop the clip into compressor and it becomes an icon at the top, click on it. When its information is in the inspector window, what is "Native Field Dominance" set to? I had a problem when I first started using Compressor and didn't notice that it defaulted to "Top First". When I changed it to "Progressive", things started looking better. Just thought I would toss that out there.
|
September 10th, 2009, 09:54 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 98
|
Thanks for the responses guys. I am away from my editing maching for a few days and will be back at it this weekend. In the meantime, a couple of things I am investigating revolving around this topic:
This footage is 1080p30 AVCHD from an HMC150. What I am then putting on DVD is 480p30 (29.97 fps progressive). I have heard that DVD needs to be either 480p24 or else 480i30, but have not found any mention anywhere of a progressive 30 frame DVD. It certainly plays fine on the DVD players I am testing on (one outputting S-video, one is composite), but I suspect that they are interlacing it. On my upconverting player going to a 720p LCD TV via HDMI, I have been happy with the result on previous projects. That player quit on me, but regardless, my customers will more than likely be using players with composite output. I think it will be some time before those go away. So, is SD (480 lines NTSC) in 29.97 progressive a legitmate format on DVD? |
September 10th, 2009, 09:55 PM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
|
|
September 11th, 2009, 08:02 AM | #20 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
i60. There is no i30.
Yes, SD at 29.97 is an acceptable (and probably the most common in NTSC land) DVD format.
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
September 11th, 2009, 04:49 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 98
|
Yes, but is SD in progressive (not interlaced) 29.97 OK or typical as well? I see mention all over of interlaced 29.97 or progressive 23.98.
|
September 11th, 2009, 05:34 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
SD progressive 30p is split into a 60i signal normally for video equipment. You won't see a difference.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
September 16th, 2009, 12:54 PM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 215
|
Compressor and ac3
I wonder why my DVD Studio pro (Macbook Pro with SL and the new FCS) doesn't like the audio files ac3. I have used the start pop up menu option to make DVD's and I also have used the DVD settings in the settings tab. I have tried both HD and SD footage. I am making just a regular DVD. Any thoughts? Thanks
|
| ||||||
|
|