|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 31st, 2009, 08:17 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 224
|
I'm a little confused...
So is the latest release of Final Cut Studio different from/better than Final Cut Studio 2? I have 2, but the new box doesn't say 2.5 or 3 or whatever.
Seems a bit confusing. |
July 31st, 2009, 08:53 AM | #2 |
Go Go Godzilla
|
Different, yes. Better? Depends on your perspective. Live Type is gone in the new version and here's a list of changes:
Apple - Final Cut Studio - Whats New |
July 31st, 2009, 09:06 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 645
|
Yes. The new release of FCS (2009) is functionally superior to the earlier FCS2 release. It's not what you might call a night and day kind of difference for many of us, more of a disappointing incremental update, but nonetheless each app in the package is better than its earlier incarnations ... and at only $299 its a steal.
|
July 31st, 2009, 09:38 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 131
|
live type..
Luckily live type doesn't go away with a straight upgrade. Mine is still intact after upgrading last night... I however, did not do an uninstall first.
Just in case any one was wondering if they would lose livetype... Mike W.
__________________
XHA1, FCS2, Shake 4.1, 501HDV |
July 31st, 2009, 09:53 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
|
Some of the new features are not an incremental update. Adding things like media management takes a lot of code. 3D shadows and reflections isn't exactly a few simple lines of code either. I bet you there was just as many man hours and lines of code in this update as there was when FCS2 came out. They just don't jump out as much.
|
July 31st, 2009, 10:34 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 233
|
Faster rendering in FCP?
Weird, but I re-rendered a ProresHQ sequence that had a lot of Motion content, I didn't time it with FCP6, but it was quicker (noticeably) with FCP7.... don't know what is with that.
I'm on a Mac Pro 2.8 8core (early 2008) I did a complete uninstall of FCS2 and after installing the upgrade ran Applejack. Overall the programs feel more "snappy" imagination? perhaps, we'll see. p |
July 31st, 2009, 10:39 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Juneau, AK
Posts: 814
|
One more opinion.....I just upgraded from an old 1.5 ghz G4 powerbook to
a quad core 2.66 (2009 Nehalem).....I know I should have went for the octo core but in I just couldn't quite swing it and this computer is BLAZING compared to my old one (of course). So I had to upgrade my FCP from 4.5. Let's see, would I upgrade to FC Studio 2 for $699 or this new version for $299? Hmmm :-) That's the one thing we seem to be forgetting here.......the price is good....especially if you have an older version of FCP. I too am disappointed in Apple for not making this a better update. At the same time, at this point I can upgrade for $299 or go to Adobe for $1600? I'm sure at some point in the future, if Apple continues in this direction I will be making a change. But for right now, in this economy, I'm sticking with FCP for a little while longer.... especially since clients seem to be taking longer and longer (4 or 5 months at least) to pay their bills.....it kinda hurts the cash flow. To me, it seems like Motion is the app that really got some nice things. It is a really powerful 'after effects lite' now. |
| ||||||
|
|