|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 25th, 2009, 08:26 AM | #16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Playa del Rey, CA
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
It IS important for any drive that you work with EXCEPT Video. Apple and several other editors that I work with in the broadcast world, who know a heck of a lot more that I, and have produced shows for national and worldwide broadcast, all agree you NEVER Journal a drive that you cut video on. |
|
February 25th, 2009, 09:18 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 400
|
|
February 25th, 2009, 02:01 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Playa del Rey, CA
Posts: 61
|
Performance is the biggest issue. Journaling of course is designed to help get the drive back in order in case of a disaster. Every time you make ANY change to a file, it's recorded.
That's great for your main drive, but not necessarily so great for large video files etc. Here are a couple of good reads: Mac OS X: About file system journaling File Journaling in OSX Panther Explained You can also find discussions on the Apple website in the FCP forum about this as well. |
February 25th, 2009, 02:30 PM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
For the average user, even for the highest of high-end productions, the protection offered by journaling (which is the default for a very good reason) is far more important than a tiny increase in random write speeds. If you are a very advanced level editor working with uncompressed HD and you find that your drive is dropping frames and you've exhausted all other possible remedies, then you may wish to consider disabling journaling, but it's a real "Hail Mary play" if it even helps. Make sure you have a reliable UPS (power backup) as well as nightly tape backups because you're putting your data at a much higher risk of catastrophic loss. |
|
February 25th, 2009, 04:34 PM | #20 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,800
|
I had a bad experience with journaling when using an older version of OSX and FCP a few years ago. I could not print to video without dropping frames, no matter what I did. And this was on a fast, internal drive in my dual G5 tower. Reformatting the drive with journalling turned off fixed the problem. For some reason, print to video was the most finicky operation - I had no problems editing or capturing.
Fast forward to today... I have tried firewire 400 drives both with journalling on and off and don't see any problems now. So I think the new Intel machines, new operating system and new version of FCP have probably fixed any issues which used to exist with journalled drives. |
February 25th, 2009, 09:49 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 46
|
The dropped frames in print to video was most likely a bug in FCP, probably because FCP was bypassing part of the drive layer of the OS (and written before journalling was implemented.) I expect that it has been fixed by now.
ALWAYS use HFS+ Journalled when you format a drive for the Mac. You are not losing performance, and you are gaining security against losing a whole drives worth of video. It possible that in the past journalling caused a performance issue, especially in the first release of the OS with it, but I can say for sure that Leopard has improved in the way the OS tracks changes to the filesystem, and I expect there is no practical performance penalty anymore. |
| ||||||
|
|