Mixing XL1s & A1 footage at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Suite
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Final Cut Suite
Discussing the editing of all formats with FCS, FCP, FCE

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 16th, 2008, 07:54 AM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Whidbey Is, WA
Posts: 326
Mixing XL1s & A1 footage

What's the best way to work with these 2 cameras? I'll be doing a 2 camera shoot of a dance performance, that will end up as a SD DVD. Should I shoot the XL as 4.3, bring it into the 16.9 project, enlarge it to fit & then crop the horizontal? or will XL anamorphic work with the widescreen workflow of the A1? Working with FCP studio (not FCP-S-2)
__________________
www.breathedeepproductions.com
Chris Korrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 08:03 AM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Iowa City, Iowa
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Korrow View Post
What's the best way to work with these 2 cameras? I'll be doing a 2 camera shoot of a dance performance, that will end up as a SD DVD. Should I shoot the XL as 4.3, bring it into the 16.9 project, enlarge it to fit & then crop the horizontal? or will XL anamorphic work with the widescreen workflow of the A1? Working with FCP studio (not FCP-S-2)
If it is ending up as standard definition DVD, why not shoot 4:3 SD on the A1 and have a nice match from the get-go? This is a great feature of the camera that has come in handy way more than I expected it to.

To get 16:9 from a 4:3 camera like the XL1s means either an anamorphic lens adapter (which have their own problems), or cropping/stretching the image which means throwing precious pixels away.

For the best end result, I say work off best the native resolution that can be had from *both* cameras.
__________________
youtube.com/benhillmedia
linkedin.com/in/benhillmedia
Benjamin Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 04:23 PM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Whidbey Is, WA
Posts: 326
Thanks Benjamin, I had thought about that, but...

One of the reasons that I'd prefer to work in 16.9 is that there are more and more widescreen TVs out there, but more importantly, when filming a dance on stage, the dancers are usually spread out and only take a small % of the horizontal screen. 16.9 works much better for this, as 4.3 just exaggerates the dead space in the image. I realize that I'll be loosing some quality, but I'd be using the XL for the closer shots so I don't think it would be too bad. The other thing is that some of the people I know with widescreen (I don't have one, so I am ignorant on this), stretch the 4.3 & then complain about the way it looks.

I just want to know the best way to mix these 2 into a 16.9 format.
Thanks,
__________________
www.breathedeepproductions.com
Chris Korrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16th, 2008, 09:06 PM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Iowa City, Iowa
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Korrow View Post
Thanks Benjamin, I had thought about that, but...

One of the reasons that I'd prefer to work in 16.9 is that there are more and more widescreen TVs out there, but more importantly, when filming a dance on stage, the dancers are usually spread out and only take a small % of the horizontal screen. 16.9 works much better for this, as 4.3 just exaggerates the dead space in the image. I realize that I'll be loosing some quality, but I'd be using the XL for the closer shots so I don't think it would be too bad. The other thing is that some of the people I know with widescreen (I don't have one, so I am ignorant on this), stretch the 4.3 & then complain about the way it looks.

I just want to know the best way to mix these 2 into a 16.9 format.
Thanks,
Having done 16:9 every way possible (native, crop, squeeze, anamorphic, etc.) I disagree; I also say this having filmed 150+ student, collegiate and professional dance performances so I have a sense of what you're dealing with. But everyone has different priorities.

If you are set on 16:9 composition, I'd say make the A1 your wider/master shot and use the XL's faux-widescreen "squeeze" mode to get something your NLE can ingest as anamorphic, then edit it all on an anamorphic DV timeline.
__________________
youtube.com/benhillmedia
linkedin.com/in/benhillmedia
Benjamin Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17th, 2008, 03:45 AM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 795
Rent another A1 and charge it to the client?
The cameras would match perfectly. You'd have 16:9. You could maybe sell them an HD version at some point in the future.
__________________
http://www.gooderick.com
Richard Gooderick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17th, 2008, 07:45 AM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Whidbey Is, WA
Posts: 326
Benjamin,
I'll run some tests & see how it works/looks. I guess it's posible I could end up going with 4.3.
Thanks for your time.
Richard - It's more of a favor than a paying job, I'll make some decent $ from selling DVDs, but... Also the closest place to rent a camera is over 5 hours away round trip, so... But thanks.
__________________
www.breathedeepproductions.com
Chris Korrow is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Suite


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:56 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network