Thinking of going Mac / FCP at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Suite
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Final Cut Suite
Discussing the editing of all formats with FCS, FCP, FCE

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 14th, 2008, 02:28 PM   #1
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,409
Thinking of going Mac / FCP

Yes im looking at a mac setup an would like some info from users here before i make my decision.
Is an IMac good enough?
Is a Mac pro better?
Is there any hardware that i should need extra for both?

Which version of FCP? 5,6,or studio.
Studio in Sydney is $1600 thats outragous.

I have been using Vegas for the last couple years
Thanks
Simon
Simon Denny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2008, 02:52 PM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 563
Simon,

> Is an IMac good enough?

Yes.

> Is a Mac pro better?

Yes.

> Is there any hardware that i should need extra for both?

A second hard drive, large and fast, as a scratchdisk for capture and render files. On the MacPro, this can be an internal drive, while with the iMac, obviously an external drive is needed - FireWire is the obvious choice.

What you need depends a lot on what you plan to do. Uncompressed HD? Forget the iMac. MultiCam editing with lots of angles? That hard drive needs to be a lot faster all of a sudden. For standard DV and HDV, the current iMacs are great machines, though.

> Studio in Sydney is $1600 thats outragous.

Not sure what to tell you. It's not exactly cheap software in the US either. Only you can tell if it's worth it. An alternative may be the Adobe Production Suite (Premiere, After Effects, Photoshop, etc.). I have Final Cut Studio, and I love it.

- Martin
__________________
Martin Pauly
Martin Pauly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2008, 03:21 PM   #3
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Breda, Netherlands
Posts: 67
By uncompressed Hd, do you mean the Appel Intermediate?
Does an Imac function better with native HDV or AIC?
Ivo van Aart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2008, 03:31 PM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Centreville, Maryland
Posts: 258
Do a search in this furom and you'll find more specific info on iMac and Mac Pro set ups. But the short answers to you questions are...

1) The top of the line iMac is good enough for low-level HD as long as you have some sort of external video drive configuration. I have a friend in Melbourne who makes a living doing commercials on one.
2) Mac Pro is a better machine and a better investment for the long term.
3) I recommend getting as much RAM as you can afford (but don't buy it from Apple.) Otherwise, the Apple Tech Specs Page is pretty concise: http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/...pro/specs.html

Vegas is a pretty good editor, what's turning you off it?
__________________
http://twitter.com/tedmcneil
Theodore McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2008, 04:20 PM   #5
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,409
Whats putting me off,
I'm getting a bit frustrated with color correction and i'm thinking that maybe FCP will do a better job, and also it seems the grass is always greener on the otherside?
Vegas is a great editor but why with everyone i speak to they say that FCP is better. what am i missing? or are all theses NLE the same but with slight changes in what they can do.
At the end of the day i need to capture, edit,CC, compress to mpeg or whatever. I'm still wondering whether FCP is better at doing this or am i living in a dream world thinking that if i dont have FCP i wont be proffesional? Vegas has all the things that i need but is the next step FCP.
This is what im wondering.

Phew
Cheers
Simon
Simon Denny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2008, 04:46 PM   #6
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
Posts: 141
Same problem

I am actually faced with the same problem.
I will be upgrading from an ibook G4, and will be pursuing filming/editing full time. I'm currently working in imovie, and want to learn the best possible program so I can be versatile and well.... professional.
Most of the things in this discussion are way over my head.

I am curious as to why FCP is better than Vegas, or for that matter any other program?
__________________
"Perhaps I cannot change the wind, but I can adjust my sails"
www.keymomentsonline.com

Last edited by Mary Angelini; February 14th, 2008 at 04:52 PM. Reason: I though tit was posted in July not today.
Mary Angelini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 10:02 AM   #7
Major Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 563
Mary:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mary Angelini View Post
I am curious as to why FCP is better than Vegas, or for that matter any other program?
Hard to say - I don't believe there is a clear winner that beats the other in every category. Fact is, though, that they both have a happy and productive user community, and that good video is produced every day with either one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mary Angelini View Post
I [...] will be pursuing filming/editing full time. I'm currently working in imovie, and want to learn the best possible program so I can be versatile and well.... professional.
If you want to join the professional film editors, then maybe Avid is worth a look. I have no experience with it myself - can't afford it - but apparently it's the tool of choice for the highest-end edit suites. So with regard to your career options, Avid training may be a good investment. On the other hand, if you are going to run your own projects more or less independently (as opposed to being employed as an editor), both Vegas and Final Cut will allow you to achieve professional results.

- Martin
__________________
Martin Pauly
Martin Pauly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 12:40 PM   #8
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Halden
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Ash View Post
Studio in Sydney is $1600 thats outragous.
I'm surprised anyone would think the price of Final Cut Studio is "outragous"... Honestly, I know we all want cheap or free stuff, but there is no need to be stupid. I applaud Apple for what I consider to be very reasonable pricing for that software-package, would you prefer having to buy comparable software in the "pre-FCP" era? THAT was outrageous..
Henrik Reach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 02:35 PM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 327
Simon, if one of your main reasons for moving to FCS is enhanced color correction, you may want to specifically look at the Tech Specs that are specific to Color. Color is a strange beast, as I'll explain. I would consider it a version 1 software. It will just get better with subsequent releases, but it will still require a ton of power, both in RAM and especially in your graphics card:

http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/color/specs.html

Just to put your $1600 investment in perspective, the application Color was called Final Touch and made by a company called Silicon Color before Apple purchased it in 2006.

Final Touch was essentially a software DaVinci color grading system. Since DaVincis have dedicated hardware and control surfaces, and can easily run into a quarter of a million dollars, Final Touch's pricing was very reasonable: $1,000 for standard-def only, $5,000 for HD and $25,000 for 2K. Twenty five thousand dollars.

Now it comes bundled with Final Cut Studio. No extra charge.

These days, you can edit and professionally color grade a huge variety of SD and HD content in a variety of codecs, and even up to 4K if you use the Red camera. Plus, in addition to Color, you get a world-class editing system (FCP), a title app that used to cost hundreds (LiveType), an surround sound audio app that is very versatile (Soundtrack Pro), a motion graphics powerhouse (Motion), a full-featured compression tool (Compressor), and a world-class DVD authoring tool (DVDSP).

I hardly think Final Cut Studio is overpriced.
Scott Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 02:46 PM   #10
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 327
Mary, if most of this conversation goes over your head (your words), you may find that the whole Final Cut Studio is overkill. You can see in what I said comes with the Studio package why people might compare it very favorably to Sony's Vegas bundles. Final Cut Studio is a very complete package of high-end tools.

I wouldn't even consider trying to move from iMovie to Avid, even if your main desire is "to be professional". Yes, many, many pros use Avid. But many other pros use Final Cut, and the list is growing all the time.

If I were you, I'd dip my toes into the Final Cut waters with Final Cut Express. The interface is practically identical to Final Cut Pro, so anything you learn in Express will transfer pretty seamlessly. And unless you plan on working in some very high-end, pro HD formats, Final Cut Express will allow you to do practically anything that Final Cut Pro can do. At your level of experience, I doubt you'd notice you're missing anything.

And, for $200, you're not even taking much of a risk by trying it out:

http://www.apple.com/finalcutexpress/
Scott Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 02:51 PM   #11
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Pauly View Post
If you want to join the professional film editors, then maybe Avid is worth a look. I have no experience with it myself - can't afford it - but apparently it's the tool of choice for the highest-end edit suites. So with regard to your career options, Avid training may be a good investment. On the other hand, if you are going to run your own projects more or less independently (as opposed to being employed as an editor), both Vegas and Final Cut will allow you to achieve professional results.

- Martin
Actually, Avid is no longer the "only" choice for professional film editors. Oscar-winning editor Walter Murch cut Francis Ford Coppola's last film, Youth Without Youth entirely in Final Cut Pro, and if I'm not mistaken he cut Cold Mountain with it as well.

As far as other comments about FCP being "outrageously" priced, well, it's not. If you look at older and less-robust editing systems you'd see them costing $10,000 - $25,000. By these standards, FCP is a bargain. I have found it to be worth every penny and then some!
Frank Simpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 04:29 PM   #12
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL
Posts: 141
Lots of great information! you guys sure do know a lot.
Some of the terminology I am unaware of, that is what I was referring to as going over my head.
Is there a resource or place I can find basic terminology, definitions, ect.?

I do appreciate the input; I think I will start with FCE and work my way up.
__________________
"Perhaps I cannot change the wind, but I can adjust my sails"
www.keymomentsonline.com

Last edited by Mary Angelini; February 15th, 2008 at 04:30 PM. Reason: cant spell
Mary Angelini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 05:19 PM   #13
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,409
Thanks guys for all your input.
Yeah i know $1600 is not much but when i bundle that with a mac pro etc its starting to get beyond my back pocket.

Cheers
Simon
Simon Denny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2008, 09:59 PM   #14
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto ON Canada
Posts: 731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Ash View Post
Thanks guys for all your input.
Yeah i know $1600 is not much but when i bundle that with a mac pro etc its starting to get beyond my back pocket.
This industry isn't cheap, not by a long shot. The right tools are more expensive than your average Jane/Joe can afford, but that's because they are not for your average Jane/Joe. Pro tools never come at consumer prices (and beware the marketing term "prosumer", it's usually a bunch of B.S.)

I'm looking to upgrade my dinosaur DV suite -- a Dual-G4 PowerMac with FCS1 -- in order to do (true) HD editing. Minus a calibrated broadcast monitor, I am looking at ~$10,000 CAN for the set-up I am looking at. I'm unemployed -- or should I say, under self-employed ;-}p -- so it's going to be a long time before I can do that (my plan is to work it into my film's budget, but funding is taking a while to secure).

So, I feel your pain, but truth is, when talking dollar:power, things are better now than five years ago.
__________________
Mike Barber
"I'm laughing to stop myself from screaming."
Mike Barber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2008, 10:07 PM   #15
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Penrith, NSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Ash View Post
Thanks guys for all your input.
Yeah i know $1600 is not much but when i bundle that with a mac pro etc its starting to get beyond my back pocket.

Cheers
Simon

Simon, I'm not sure what your budget is but you may want to check out the package that Videocraft (Sydney & Melbourne) have on offer. I was thinking about getting it late last year but opted instead to buy a new high end mountain bike.(BTW, I don't work for them but found the package to be reasonably priced).

Last edited by Andrew Farrell; February 17th, 2008 at 11:51 PM. Reason: spelling
Andrew Farrell is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Suite


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network