|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 31st, 2007, 11:03 AM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,498
|
FCP Machine Recommendations
Hi folks, I'm another FCP wannbie to make the switch from PC. Currently looking out for a decent system to invest in for handling HD and HDV with FCP. Would like to know what is recommended as it is going to be a big investment. Thanks!
I understand Mac Pro is recommended and Macbook Pro as well. I'm leaned towards the Macbook Pro for the portability. -Would external 1TB Firewire HDD work with the Mac? I have a Maxtor. -Would 2Gb Memory be sufficient? I have never touched FCP b4 and doing a lot of research now -Any DVI enabled monitor sould work with a MAc Pro right? Say if I am looking at having HDMI preview via a Full HD capable LCD TV, I would need to add something like a Blackmagic Card right? -Does the memory of the GPU affects the performance of FCS2 softwares? Will 128MB and 256MB see a big diff in performance? |
October 31st, 2007, 11:17 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,195
|
Hi,
I'm looking at making the switch too, so I don't know perfect answers, but I think I can help somehow: - I think working with a external firewire drife should present no problem. If it's formatted in NTSF however, the 'PC' format, you can only read and copy from the disc on a mac, but you can't write it. You have to format it for Mac... - Don't know for sure if 2GB if enough, but I've cut HDV in Premiere Pro on a 1GB machine without problems, so I think you won't have a problem. If you are doing heavy work in 'Motion' or 'Color' (both part of Final Cut Studio 2), you maybe want to invest in extra RAM, but it's very expensive for a Macbook Pro! - Don't know about the monitor. - if I'm correct, don't know for sure, Color needs at least a 256MB for it to run smoothly. if you Don't I think you still will be able to run Color, but it will be a bit slower, some frames will have a delay, etc... |
October 31st, 2007, 11:22 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 416
|
If you want to monitor HD from a Mac, investigate the Matrox MXO.
This is specifically designed to do this, with a low cost (read: computer) display - e.g. Apple 23" or Dell 2407 - with the colour look-up table and interlace handling to allow proper HD colour correction and monitoring at a fraction of alternative costs. As it works via the DVI output, it also works with MacBook Pro. Look it up here, and on Apple's own FCP forums.
__________________
Martin at HeadSpin HD on Blu-ray |
October 31st, 2007, 11:33 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,498
|
I should think going for the Mac Pro would be a better choice. Its a hugh investment in my country to get the system up. Oh but my current system is not formated in NTFS.. argh....
|
November 1st, 2007, 07:07 AM | #5 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
|
|
November 1st, 2007, 07:42 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 416
|
Thanks for that heads-up, David.
Matrox are in beta with the MXO/Leopard driver, with progress being discussed here.
__________________
Martin at HeadSpin HD on Blu-ray |
November 1st, 2007, 07:50 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,498
|
Oh yes.. so what it means is the current DVI output would not be accurate in terms of colour. The MAtrox would be required to do the trick right?
|
| ||||||
|
|