|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 24th, 2014, 05:54 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: www.faymusmedia.com
Posts: 203
|
New MacPro 8-Core Test Results. What Do You Think?
So I was thinking about getting the 12-core Mac Pro however after reading numerous posts the 12-core is faster than the eight core with multithread processing however is actually noticeably slower than the 8-core when it comes to single core computing specifically for encoding H.264.
Here is a link to my geek bench result, how does this look? browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1093026 Below is some of the test results I have achieved between my different machines. Macbook Retina Pro (mid-2012): Editing off of the SSD Sandisk extreme pro via USB 3. core i7 2.6ghz 16gb ddr3 nVida 650m 1GB Hackintosh Tower: Editing off of 7200 rpm drive. 109 mbps via black magic utility LOL. core i7 nehalem overclocked @ 3.4ghz 16gb ddr 3 nVidia GeForce 480GTX 1.5 GB Mac Pro: Editing off internal SSD 950 MB/s WRITE, 905 MB/s READ! 8-core xeon E5 3.0ghz 32 gb ddr3 ECC AMD FirePro D700's 12gb gddr5 1 TB SSD Flash TEST: 15 second duration for each test clip Playback: 4k ProRes HQ NO Effects macbook retina = 20 fps hackintosh = 24 fps 4k ProRes HQ LUT, Color Correct macbook retina = 16 fps hackintosh = 18 fps Mac Pro = 24 fps 4k ProRes HQ LUT, Color Correct, NR macbook retina = 1 fps hackintosh = 5 fps Mac Pro = 24 fps 4k RAW NO Effects macbook retina = 11 fps hackintosh = 5 fps Mac Pro = 24 fps 4k RAW CC, LUT macbook retina = 3 fps hackintosh = 9 fps Mac Pro = 23 fps 4k RAW CC, LUT, NR macbook retina = 1 fps hackintosh = 4 fps Mac Pro = 17 fps 2.5k RAW NO Effects macbook retina = 14 fps hackintosh = 19 fps 2.5k RAW CC, LUT macbook retina = 8 fps hackintosh = 20 fps Mac Pro = 24 fps 2.5k RAW CC, LUT, NR macbook retina = 3 fps hackintosh = 10 fps Mac Pro = 22 fps Render: 4k ProRes HQ NO Effects macbook retina = 13 fps hackintosh = 13 fps 4k ProRes HQ CC, LUT macbook retina = 12 fps hackintosh = 12 fps Mac Pro = 41 fps 4k ProRes HQ CC, LUT, NR macbook retina = 1 fps hackintosh = 5 fps Mac Pro = 32 fps 4k RAW NO Effects macbook retina = 4 fps hackintosh = 8 fps 4k RAW CC, LUT macbook retina = 3 fps hackintosh = 7 fps Mac Pro = 22 fps 4k RAW CC, LUT, NR macbook retina = 0-1 fps hackintosh = 4 fps Mac Pro = 17 fps 2.5k RAW NO Effects macbook retina = 7 fps hackintosh = 11 fps 2.5k RAW CC, LUT macbook retina = 5 fps hackintosh = 11 fps Mac Pro = 38 fps 2.5k RAW CC, LUT, NR macbook retina = 2 fps hackintosh = 7 fps Mac Pro = 23 fps 5 second 4k prores clip with color correction: macbook retina pro (mid 2012): 3 minutes 29 seconds hackintosh: 1 minute 3 seconds 8-core new mac pro: 28 seconds Resolve 4k ProRes HQ. Color Correction, LUT, NR Macbook Retina 2012: Playback = 1 fps, Render = 1 fps Hackintosh: Playback = 5 fps, Render = 5 fps 8-core mac pro: Playback 24 fps, Render = 32 fps EDIT: More Test Results Added. **The Macbook Retina Below is the newer version. I sold the one above and conducted these tests with the new Macbook Retina Pro. Its noticeably faster than the 2012 model, and 2013 model. Cinebench CPU Macbook Retina Pro 15" (mid-2014 *Brand New*) - 602 CB MacPro 8-Core - 1180 CB (12-core is 1279cb) 1080p HD timeline in FCPX - Approximately 3:52 length. Render to h.264 Macbook Retina Pro 15" (mid-2014 *Brand New*) Single Pass = 0:44 Multi Pass = 6:20 MacPro 8-core Single Pass = 3:20 Multi Pass = 3:59 4k Timeline 3840x2160 FCPX - Approximately 5 Second Clip. Render to ProRes HQ - Film Look, contrast, color, txt Macbook Retina Pro 15" (mid-2014 *Brand New*) Render Time = 0:09 MacPro 8-core Render Time = 0:05 4k Timeline 3840x2160 FCPX - Approximately 5 Second Clip. Render to h.264 - Film Look, contrast, color, txt Macbook Retina Pro 15" (mid-2014 *Brand New*) Single Pass = 0:17 Multi Pass = 0:33 MacPro 8-core Single Pass = 0:10 Multi Pass = 0:18
__________________
www.faymusmedia.com - www.facebook.com/faymusmedia - www.twitter.com/faymusmedia - www.youtube.com/faymusmedia - www.vimeo.com/faymusmedia Last edited by Corey Benoit; October 24th, 2014 at 08:14 PM. |
October 24th, 2014, 08:02 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
Re: New MacPro 8-Core Test Results. What Do You Think?
Very impressive results however how much of the incredible speed difference between single and multi core is the result of the video boards in the MacPro?
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
October 24th, 2014, 08:14 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: www.faymusmedia.com
Posts: 203
|
Re: New MacPro 8-Core Test Results. What Do You Think?
Thanks. More test results added
|
October 25th, 2014, 08:58 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: www.faymusmedia.com
Posts: 203
|
Re: New MacPro 8-Core Test Results. What Do You Think?
Its also cool to see that the 8-core is only 5.8% slower than the 12-core on cinebench in multi-cpu test, yet its 30.5% faster in the single cpu test. 8-core truly is the best balance.
Also many have worried or complained about the GPU not being ready for gaming. The cinebench results show that the D700's are powerful. |
| ||||||
|
|