April 14th, 2008, 03:38 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scotland, Ayr www.amour weddingvideos.co.uk
Posts: 305
|
Use of a PVR dvd recorder
Hi after discussing how a company were offering same day DVDs on the event forum and then watching them using a PVR dvd recorder i did a search on this forum to see if other people have tried this method.I didnt find much discussion except from a couple of years ago (maybe i missed it?)
However has anyone successfully done this. The company i watched used AV leads out into the PVR and having watched the dvd it stutters quite a lot in all my players , picture quality is ok sort of (on my 28 inch crt TV) . I see that some PVRs offer dv input any thoughts on the subject as its not something I had thought viable...if this has been discussed before ..sorry..thanks john |
April 14th, 2008, 04:45 AM | #2 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
I have to record a lot of shows/concerts etc at school and church services. To speed up making DVDs I now use a separate domestic DVD recorder - a Philips DVDR3460H which I bought in Costco. It has a built in 250 GB Hard Drive and inputs are composite/S video/Firewire. I use the Firewire and my workflow is either: (a) Record straight from the camera to a DVD Pros: DVD ready as soon as I stop filming (just needs 'finished' - a couple of minutes) Much much faster than using a computer. Cons: Not much editing possible - OK for simple shows like church Services. No fancy menus possible in final DVD, and basic time interval chapters only. Estimate for a 1 hour service - 10 mins (plus the 1 hour of course) for the master copy. (b) Record straight from the camera to the 250 GB HD first before burning to DVD Pros: Can be 'topped and tailed' - bits can be cut out before burning to disk. I can have simple separate titles pre prepared for inclusion as separate files on the HD and include them in the burn. Still faster than via computer. Cons: Takes a little longer than above - editing time plus another 10/15 minutes to burn the disk afterwards. Again, no fancy menus possible in final DVD and basic time interval chapters only. Estimate for a 1 hour service - 30 mins for the first or master copy. (c) Record from multiple cameras via vision mixer to the 250 GB HD first before burning to DVD Pros: Full live multi camera mixing then can be 'topped and tailed' as above. Cons: As above plus increased stress unless a team effort. I have done this all myself using remote controls on 2 of the cameras while working the mixer. Not recommended! When using the vision mixer, I can run prepared title sequences and mix them in on the fly from a separate DVD player connected to the mixer. For better results, I still edit some shows/services the conventional way and import the footage to FCE or (iMovie for simple projects). |
|
April 14th, 2008, 06:27 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scotland, Ayr www.amour weddingvideos.co.uk
Posts: 305
|
thanks for the reply colin, I see you have firewire input so how do you rate the quality of the picture compared to the usual capture to tape- pc-then render method. I suppose you dont have too much fast motion in the final dvd but how do you think the mpeg compression holds up. Also what about compatability with other players and final question (phew) when you capture to the hard drive I assume that is still mpeg2..many thanks john
|
April 14th, 2008, 12:38 PM | #4 | ||
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
I've used the first 3 (HQ/1 hour; Standard Play/2 hours; Standard Play Plus/2.5 hours) and they are all fine for normal watching but obviously HQ is best. The 8 hour setting will be unspeakable of course. Once the disks are finished they play fine on any DVD player or computer I've used. I've passed on lots of copies to kids and adults and no complaints yet about DVDs not playing. (Lots of moans about kids passing scratched copies on to others though - why don't they keep them in the sleeves I supply)? Quote:
If it helps I could email you the pdf users' manual. Sorry John, I forgot you were so near at hand. If you like I could burn a DVD of something and post it to you. Let me know. Last edited by Colin McDonald; April 14th, 2008 at 12:43 PM. Reason: Remembered where I live |
||
April 15th, 2008, 06:18 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scotland, Ayr www.amour weddingvideos.co.uk
Posts: 305
|
thanks colin, googled it and got the pdf from philips..its certainly interesting and I can see the benefit for work that doesnt require editing and quick delivery ..out of interest what cameras do you use..cheers john
|
April 15th, 2008, 06:39 AM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 1,546
|
Used to be consumer Sonys like the DCRTRV25E. Have my own canon XH-A1 now and have acquired Canon HV30s for use at work. Still do mostly SD and will for some time - just introducing 16:9 SD but looking ahead hence the HD capability.
|
| ||||||
|
|