|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Views: 3737
|
![]() |
#16 | |
Tourist
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
It is a Quicktime, 1280x720 H.264 file. Uploaded version was 266mb for a clip that is just over 2 minutes long. I have to say that the vimeo version looks significantly better to me. Amelia on Playground HD on Vimeo YouTube - Amelia Plays on the Playground At least for this video at these settings, on my computer, the Vimeo version looks much better. (The test video is a clip of my neice playing on a playground, so if you don't like kids or you don't like "home videos" don't click on the links). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 67
|
And you are right. These are the reasons:
- Your video is steady as hell, so is "compress friendly". - Vimeo has a 1280x720 video resolution, instead of Youtube's 960x540. So, in this particular case, where bitrate is not a problem, Vimeo wins. But try now a video with more action and you get this: - Vimeo: blocky but sharp when the camera stops. - Youtube: sharp all the time with no artifacts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|