|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 26th, 2009, 10:43 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 2235
|
January 26th, 2009, 11:43 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
If I had to guess... The giant bell was the EX1, as were the distant fireworks shots. (BTW, the blacks seemed to be lifted on the distant shots.) The scenes among the people were the 5D MkII, as were the final out-of-focus shots.
How'd I do?
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
January 26th, 2009, 12:16 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 27
|
Youtube is so crappy, it's almost impossible to distinguish good source footage from less good.
I've seen your vimeo pieces shot with the 5D, and they look great. If you could repost this there, I might have a good shot at telling the sources apart. |
January 26th, 2009, 12:19 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 991
|
Hmm I'm pretty sure the stationary shots showing the fireworks and the skyline were all EX1.. as well some shots before that were we can see the roofs of the old styled buildings. Those shots just looked crisper and more "HD" to me.. The 5D2 clips on the other hand looked muddier by comparison. In fact, I'm willing to say that all shots where the sparks were rendered more crisp were from the EX1.. Why is that?
|
January 26th, 2009, 12:46 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Click on the "Watch in HD" link at the bottom right of the video. (If you haven't already.)
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
January 26th, 2009, 01:58 PM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
Still doesn't look nearly as good as most stuff I see posted on vimeo. The compression artifacts are much more noticeable to me on Youtube. |
|
January 26th, 2009, 02:13 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 27
|
A couple of specific shots I'm willing to go out on a limb for:
@ 1:53 - The young girl twirling the tubular firework that gives off a trail of sparks looks to be Canon. The depth of field seems very shallow, and the bokeh looks very high quality. @ 1:57 and 2:02 - Guy setting a bundle of fireworks down and walking away. Definitely looks like 5D because of the "jelly" effect in the motion. I also notice that a lot of shots have milkier blacks with more noise (e.g., 0:35) and some have cleaner blacks (e.g., 2:13). I'm guessing the former are EX-1 and the latter are 5D. |
January 28th, 2009, 10:08 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
As also posted over on the EX forum, the entire opening up to the bell is shot on the 5dmkII , the fireworks after that are on the EX-1 apart from one shot at 00.48 which is 5dmkII. The people on the street are all 5dmkII and the defocussed fireworks at the end are a combination of EX-1 and 5dmkII shots.
Elizabeth, Ive put a 720p version on Vimeo here http://vimeo.com/2982037 if anyone wants to download or compare quality. Dan |
January 28th, 2009, 10:10 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
|
|
January 29th, 2009, 01:46 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 124
|
Dan...
... can you tell which software you edited this piece on? Thanks.
|
January 29th, 2009, 01:51 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Beijing
Posts: 665
|
Final Cut Pro
Dan |
January 29th, 2009, 05:26 PM | #12 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Milton, FL
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|