|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 1st, 2009, 12:55 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 11084
|
September 1st, 2009, 09:30 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
AUUGGHHHHH!!! Damn those people at Canon--Trains going by and NO rolling shutter effect. Now I want one! If the footage had had the tearing I've seen from other cameras, I wouldn't want it. Now I've gotta have one. Curses!
|
September 1st, 2009, 09:57 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 613
|
i assume the oversharpening and highlight clipping is just poorly processed footage and/or bad picture profile. i am a bit impressed i dont see any jello going on on the extremely shaky motorcycle pov shot, but it might just be too fast to see anything.
|
September 1st, 2009, 10:13 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 99
|
actually there is plenty rolling shutter on the train if you pause it on a frame with the dark gap between carriages. Bad as ever.
__________________
www.pfilm.co.uk |
September 1st, 2009, 10:19 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 84
|
The shaky car footage proves it for me, looks great!
|
September 1st, 2009, 10:25 AM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I'll check it out again, but if I can't see it when it's playing at normal speed, I can live with it. Could be the train is going too fast. However, they have some other shots at slower speeds with lots of vertical lines and I don't see any problems.
|
September 1st, 2009, 10:50 AM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: McHenry, Illinois
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
|
|
September 1st, 2009, 11:06 AM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I wonder what happens with slower horizontal movement. In the Nikon footage I saw, the image would tear, like the bottom half of a vertical line was behind the top half. It was really noticeable. I didn't see this black thing when playing at normal speed.
|
September 3rd, 2009, 10:53 AM | #9 | |
Go Go Godzilla
|
Quote:
This is also evident in every telephone pole and building that passes by from the inside-train view. Unfortunately there's no getting away from the side effects of a rolling shutter; maybe at some point Canon - and other's brands using rolling shutters - will create software in-camera to compensate for skew but for today it's a very evident and potentially nasty "gotcha" that you must be aware of with either fast moving objects or camera panning. |
|
September 3rd, 2009, 11:07 AM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Woburn, MA
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
RollingShutter might be worth getting. It certainly looks impressive: RollingShutter Reminds Us That While Jello Wiggles, Videos Should Not - Rollingshutter - Gizmodo The rolling shutter I have seen on the 5D and 7D samples seems to be much lower than the D90 samples I've seen. I think I could mostly live with the examples seen in the 7D |
|
September 3rd, 2009, 02:19 PM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
I agree with the assertion that nobody in the world cares about rolling shutter artifacts except video people. In every instance, I have had to point it out to family members and friends on shows I have shot with CMOS cameras with rolling shutter.
It's all us people, nobody else gives a **** Dan |
September 3rd, 2009, 03:40 PM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Same with aliasing. Aliasing didn't stop NTSC from earning trillions of dollars for the industry over its lifetime.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
September 3rd, 2009, 04:49 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,109
|
Good one Jon, I totally agree. Most people in our line of work worry far too much about the techno geek nitpicking search for the "perfect" camera and image and not enough on the writing, concept, storyline, directing and acting.
Dan |
September 3rd, 2009, 04:57 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 991
|
Did anyone not see those shaking car footage? The roller is almost none existent!
How often do you film passing trains perpendicularly? |
September 3rd, 2009, 05:43 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
Yeah. Aliasing, interlace twitter, skew, oversharpening, oversaturation, OOF shots, cockeyed horizon, poor resolution, wonky compression artifacts, clipped audio, and tons more. Most people don't care one whit about any of that stuff, yet it all drives me absolutely crazy. I want to claw my eyes out sometimes.
|
| ||||||
|
|