|
|
|
|
|
December 11th, 2008, 06:45 PM
|
#1 |
|
Wrangler
|
Is CBR the way to go for DVDs less than 60 minutes?
Any thoughts on this? Does CBR make the most sense?
__________________
"Ultimately, the most extraordinary thing, in a frame, is a human being." - Martin Scorsese |
|
|
|
December 12th, 2008, 10:12 AM
|
#2 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
Depends on the bitrate. If you use max, it makes no difference.
|
|
|
|
|
December 12th, 2008, 07:53 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Conway, NH
Posts: 1,745
|
Quote:
I generally use VBR-1 pass to handle any spikes in the data rate. If I see anything untoward, I'll run it again with 2 pass. |
|
|
|
|
|
December 14th, 2008, 05:47 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 234
|
For videos 60 minutes and under I just set it to CBR 1-pass 6300kbps and forget it. Footage looks beautiful...no issues with crossfades/whatnot.
|
|
|
|
|
July 26th, 2009, 03:46 AM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Echuca, Victoria, Australiamate
Posts: 179
|
Ive found my best pictures, including crossfades, animation effects and such comes with a two pass render.
Essentially its 8mbps max, 6mbps min and average, two pass. I was doing a CBR, and found image degredation in the effects, such as a title fading in/out, but fine on general vision. The biggest secret was to render the whole project to an .avi file first, THEN render that new one to MPEG2. Doing that saves time. Doing the two pass render keeps the quality. Ben |
|
|
|
 |
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
