April 22nd, 2008, 06:31 PM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Funky Flicker in DVD Menu
I created a menu background image in Photoshop for a wedding DVD, and the preview looked fine in DVD Studio Pro. After burning the disc I find that there is flickering in the pixels all over the image, except where the concrete wall is darker and in the bride's veil. It looks like the artifacts you get when you compress video for the web. I don't understand how DVD Studio Pro would have a hard time compressing a still image, though. I mean, the pixels don't change at all.
I've used Photoshop in the past to create menu backgrounds for DVD Studio Pro, and I've never had this issue. I just created one last week and used the same template file for this one. Any ideas? |
April 23rd, 2008, 02:22 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 101
|
try a 1 or 2 pixel blur - that often removes flicker?
(and 1 or 2 pixel blur will be all but unnoticeable) |
April 23rd, 2008, 08:05 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 563
|
If blurring doesn't help, and assuming you have a little space on the DVD left, you could turn the still into a 30 second or so movie and compress that into an MPEG-2 using Compressor. I've had good results doing that in cases where still images look strange. You could use a shorter duration, but then the menu will "stutter" (i.e. respond slowly to remote control buttons) each time it loops.
- Martin
__________________
Martin Pauly |
April 23rd, 2008, 12:01 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Maybe that's it. I used unsharp mask in Photoshop to give the image a little more pop, but that also increased the detail level in the image. I hate to blur the image at all, but maybe a 2 pixel blur will fix it and won't be noticeable. Thanks for the tip, guys.
Oh, and the menu loop is already set for 30 seconds. |
April 23rd, 2008, 01:11 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
I performed a gausian blur of .4 on the still image and it fixed the problem. It didn't blur the image a lot, but I have to say it's pretty annoying that I have a professional DVD program that can't handle a nice-looking sharp image.
Thanks for the tip, though, I'm really glad it worked! |
April 23rd, 2008, 04:13 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 101
|
it's nothing to do with the professional DVD program. It's to do with the 1950's technology CRT-based television that you're showing it on.
TV's don't have to be interlaced nowadays, but they are, in order to be backwardly compatible with the original televisions. |
April 23rd, 2008, 04:21 PM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Quote:
Also, for the record, the .4 gausian blur didn't remove all flicker. On my 2nd inspection I noticed just a few slight area where there was still flicker. Apparently DVD Studio Pro can't handle areas of high contrast in still images very well. |
|
April 24th, 2008, 09:23 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
Quote:
I don't believe that studio pro would have trouble with high contrast. But video in general has trouble with gradients, and that pic is one big gradient. |
|
April 24th, 2008, 02:08 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Yeah, I was quite surprised that it had trouble compressing a still image, considering the pixels aren't changing from one frame to the next. I did bring the still into Final Cut Pro and export to Quicktime and brought it into DVDSP, but the image lost resolution along the way, which wasn't what I wanted.
The majority of the pixel flickering was in the concrete wall above the couple's heads. I'm guessing that the detail and high contrast there is what gave DVDSP's compression process trouble, though again, I don't understand why a professional program like this would have trouble with compressing a still image whose pixels don't change from one frame to the next. Frustrating. |
April 24th, 2008, 02:35 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
There are a lot of little spots in that wall, and it's a big gradient so I can see it being a problem. Maybe you could mask the people out in photoshop and just blur the background wall by at least 2%. I've had this problem with scanned images from books which were made up of fine dots, so I just had to blur it.
|
April 24th, 2008, 03:37 PM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Yeah, I understand that it's the extreme contrast in the detail on the wall that's the problem, but I guess I don't understand why. I mean, it's a still image right? So when DVDSP goes to compress it why wouldn't it recognize that the pixels don't change at all from one frame to the next? The compression placed on one frame should just repeat to the next frame. I don't get why it doesn't.
If this was a video shot, in motion, then I could understand the problem, because there would be some movement in the shot and therefore you'd have a difference in pixels from one frame to the next. |
April 24th, 2008, 04:58 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: california North and South
Posts: 642
|
try a 30 second video for the still backdrop. Drop the still pic in a 24p (23.98) then export from your editor to your DVD creator program. It should work just fine.
|
April 24th, 2008, 05:39 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Well, when I brought the image in to FCP it lost resolution immediately. I noticed it looked soft. Would that change by bringing it onto a 24P timeline vs. a 29.97fps timeline?
|
April 25th, 2008, 01:53 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 101
|
Maybe your problem is with the white flecks in the bricks.
if they're 1 pixel high, and your video is interlaced, then every frame, they'll be disappearing and reappearing 25/30 times a second... |
April 25th, 2008, 02:28 AM | #15 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
I don't think it's that, because it looks like the flicker happens about every second or so. Also, I should specify that the flicker is composed of small clumps of "artifacts", as you would see with poor compression in a video. Maybe I didn't describe the "flicker" well enough earlier. It's not just a flicker in the image, it's a flicker of artifacts or "small clumps of pixels".
|
| ||||||
|
|