May 7th, 2007, 07:49 PM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Bill |
|
May 7th, 2007, 09:24 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 222
|
Bill,
Awesome job! I loved this short! So funny watching the relationship battles simplified into 'who has the control'. What were your quicktime compression settings, really clean. The shots were nice. The actors did a great job. And really your post-production was great, the audio, the supers, everything was flawless. Loved it. |
May 7th, 2007, 11:18 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 77
|
Hey Bill,
Great film! I love how you showed the progression of a relationship through the eyes of T.V. Very clever! It makes me wonder what my T.V. thinks when it watches me? haha! Anyway, I loved the backwards text and the voice work was awesome! Jamey* |
May 7th, 2007, 11:41 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fletcher Hills, CA
Posts: 211
|
Well Bill, you know I'm already a fan, but I really loved this little gem. Especially the reverse SD vs ?? supers etc. (although I immediately questioned the 16:9 screen that has rounded corners :).
I already told you I found it depressing but clever. If I were going to change something, it'd be the end. I'd make the couple discover compromise, in a funny way. She'd change the channel to something girly, then she'd fall asleep next to him, and he'd change it to wrestling or NASCAR, all the while holding her next to him. Just for 5 seconds, then cut to black. I'd also throw in a quick shot of the cat sneaking in to claw at the sofa when they're not around. Still, nicely done. |
May 8th, 2007, 01:26 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 72
|
Great idea, and very well done. Will be tough to vote in this contest.
|
May 8th, 2007, 01:42 PM | #21 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
I very much liked this film. I did think the husband was going to call a dating service, order girls gone wild or divorce lawyer at the end (girls gone wild advertise a lot during late night sports shows), but a well executed piece, creative, well-acted (which make it stand out) and memorable.
|
May 8th, 2007, 09:08 PM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Black Mountain, NC
Posts: 488
|
As has been said, this was a very effective use of non-verbal communication. A lot was said with a few gestures. And the changing sets told a story on their own. The acting was excellent. Only thing I didn't like was the ending which seemed a downer, but then again not everything has a Hollywood ending.
|
May 9th, 2007, 07:23 AM | #23 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Carson Valley, Nevada
Posts: 248
|
Quote:
This was fantastic. All I can say. I would submit this to some more film festivals. Jeff
__________________
www.tahoestarr.com |
|
May 11th, 2007, 03:11 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 216
|
DO NOT READ THIS POST UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE VOTED!!!!
REALLY!!! I MEAN IT!!!! OK, did you vote? Yes? Keep reading. Didn't vote? Stop, don't keep reading!!! All right. A few folks were disappointed with the "downer" ending of The Remote = Control, so I've recut the ending in a new version. This version doesn't count for the DVC8 competition, so if you haven't voted yet, DON'T LOOK AT THE NEW VERSION and only judge the original version!!! Now, if you have voted, I'd be interested to hear if you think the new ending is an improvement. I've sent this to a few folks already and most seem to prefer the new ending. Regardless, if you have the time, I'd really be interested in hearing if folks like the new ending or not. The new version can be found at http://www.wrgardner.com/film/RemoteControl Note that the original, DVC8 version is still available at the initial links Dylan posted. I haven't changed anything there. So, if you have an opinion either way, I'd like to hear it. And if possible, just send me an email with your opinions rather than clutter up this thread (click on my name to the left of this post and click on "Send email to William Gardner"). Thanks much! Bill |
| ||||||
|
|