August 23rd, 2006, 03:17 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miller Place, NY
Posts: 820
|
I didn't notice the family photos in the background, that's a nice touch now that you mention it.
Great film (love the line about subcontracting to another star), but I think it was a little slow to be a believable news piece; when the reporter swings around on the picnic table, for example, that felt like it should've been tighter to me. Other than that, and maybe a different angle of the NASA sign--that light pole is right in front of the sign, though I understand we all have limitations when it comes to camera position--I loved this. The reenactment was it for me, I was cracking up, really a hilarious idea! |
August 23rd, 2006, 03:56 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
Thanks for the feedback. |
|
August 23rd, 2006, 07:32 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 132
|
Kris, I was a little nervous about commenting on your piece prior to mine coming out, you can see why now.
It is amazing how a simple theme that has such a broad definition can be interpreted so simarly by different people. What really threw me was we both had NASA scientists. At least we used different scientists. Having said that, I enjoyed the parody. Your reporter did a great job. I would agree that the lighting on the reporter could have used some help. I HATE shooting in the sun. The best outdoor shoots I have had were done when it was heavily overcast. Good work! |
August 23rd, 2006, 08:12 PM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
You, me, Sean, all a little bit similar and yet very different. Kinda fun how that turns out. |
|
| ||||||
|
|