|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 31st, 2007, 06:27 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Smithfield, Pennsylvania
Posts: 226
|
Youtube to be in H.264?
In the promotional material released for the updated AppleTV, which now plays Youtube videos, it was mentioned that Youtube would be switching from their Flash-based video encoding to H.264 for new video starting June 1, and all their current videos would be reencoded. There is very little (nothing, actually) on Youtube's site about this.
This brings up several interesting questions: 1) Could Youtube start carrying widescreen videos for clips shot with HDV cameras? 2) Has Youtube actually kept all the thousands of gigabytes of original video uploaded to their servers so they can properly reencode to H.264? 3) If they give us the specs for the final product, can we upload video already encoded to H.264, saving their encoding time and insuring that our video remains unmolested? 4) Why didn't I think of any of this? ;) |
June 3rd, 2007, 12:15 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 595
|
"According to Apple VP David Moody, the reason for this delay is that all current YouTube content will need to be transcoded to Apple's preferred video standard, H.264. All content uploaded in June, however, will be automatically encoded into H.264, so additional transcoding will not be necessary for any of these newer files."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube |
June 4th, 2007, 06:04 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
That is such good news! Yet I find it hard to believe they won't do any transcoding. What if your video is too long (300MB)?
|
June 4th, 2007, 07:51 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 595
|
I guess if it's too long, they won't "transcode" per se, they'll just "recompress" using the same codec. Transcoding is the act of converting digital content from one format to another. They'll be keeping it in the same format.
|
June 4th, 2007, 11:29 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
You're right, I used the wrong term, however the result is the same: a drop in quality.
|
June 5th, 2007, 08:10 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
The best option would be to specify what do they exactly want (size, length, bitrate for both video and audio), so we can upload in that format. This would give us full control over "the look".
|
| ||||||
|
|