|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 18th, 2009, 09:33 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 40
|
Bit Rate Numbers
This has probably been covered some ware but I can't find it. I remember reading a few years back that its best to set bit rates to a number that’s divisible by 32 (it was probably 8 or 16 in the early days). I don't know if its still applicable, but a guy in our building and I were discussing bit rates today and it came up. Is this another famous myth or is there any validity to it?
__________________
Sean Malone |
November 18th, 2009, 09:44 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Bit rates??? No. Frame sizes.. yes. But not by 32. Generally by 8 or by 4. Why on earth would bit rate need to be divisible by anything? With VBR it's essentially impossible anyway.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
November 18th, 2009, 10:15 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 40
|
Sounds like myth. VBR is a great point. Glade I asked though, I didn't know about the "Frame Size" aspect of things.
Thanks,
__________________
Sean Malone |
November 19th, 2009, 12:11 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia (formerly Winnipeg, Manitoba) Canada
Posts: 4,088
|
MPEG-1 dimensions need to be divisible by 8, but not bitrate.
__________________
Shaun C. Roemich Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC - Videographer - Webcaster www.roaddogmedia.ca Blog: http://roaddogmedia.wordpress.com/ |
December 11th, 2009, 09:42 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
Even if the codec doesn't require it, making frame dimensions divisible by 8 will help make encoding more efficient (even if just slightly).
|
| ||||||
|
|